[Pythonmac-SIG] Help getting started with py-appscript

2008-04-03 Thread Dewey V. Schorre
I began by installing py-appscript like this: macpro-administrators-computer:~ val$ sudo easy_install appscript . . . Finished processing dependencies for appscript macpro-administrators-computer:~ val$ I thought that had worked, so I began the tutorial like this:

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Carbon bindings' future

2008-04-03 Thread Kevin Walzer
has wrote: > > As a long-term strategy for Python as a whole, sure. The above > suggestion was for Kevin as a solution to his own more immediate needs. > Well, my commercial Python application isn't going to break tomorrow if I don't remove the Carbon bits, but it seems the long-term tides a

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Carbon bindings' future (was: Re: eliminating appscript-triggered Dock icon)

2008-04-03 Thread has
On 3 Apr 2008, at 13:17, Ronald Oussoren wrote: > > On 1 Apr, 2008, at 22:09, has wrote: >> On 1 Apr 2008, at 19:03, Kevin Walzer wrote: >> >> >>> Yuk. Looks like I will have to remove the Carbon bits from my app at >>> some point! >> >> Or just do what I did with appscript: fork off the bits you n

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] eliminating appscript-triggered Dock icon

2008-04-03 Thread Ronald Oussoren
On 1 Apr, 2008, at 22:09, has wrote: On 1 Apr 2008, at 19:03, Kevin Walzer wrote: What does the "de-Macification" in Python 3.0 mean? Will the Carbon modules be removed? I've found the answer to my own question: http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3108/ Yuk. Looks like I will have to remove

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] eliminating appscript-triggered Dock icon

2008-04-03 Thread Ronald Oussoren
On 1 Apr, 2008, at 17:37, Kevin Walzer wrote: has wrote: With the general de-Macification of Python 3.0 being planned, I wonder if the python3.0 interpreter should take the same approach, leaving it up to individual modules to decide if and when they want a GUI connection? Anyone any tho