Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] IDE that doesn't look awful?

Christopher Barker wrote: Robin Dunn wrote: Given that I'm Mr. wxPython I'm sometimes a bit embarrassed to admit that I've been using WingIDE more and more lately (transitioning from Emacs) instead of one of the wx-based editors. Almost every day I cuss at it for being so butt ugly on Mac and

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] IDE that doesn't look awful?

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Christopher Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A lot of folks like TextMate. "Python Usage 101" @ -- Ned Deily, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Pythonmac-SIG maillist - Pythonmac-SIG@pyth

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] IDE that doesn't look awful?

Kevin Walzer wrote: Joe Strout wrote: Is there any Python IDE that looks and feels more like a proper Mac app? ... Komodo is a fairly robust editor and has both free and commercial editions; it's built on Mozilla, so doesn't look perfectly native, but Hi all, I'd be interesting in comments

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] IDE that doesn't look awful?

Robin Dunn wrote: Given that I'm Mr. wxPython I'm sometimes a bit embarrassed to admit that I've been using WingIDE more and more lately (transitioning from Emacs) instead of one of the wx-based editors. Almost every day I cuss at it for being so butt ugly on Mac and not being native, but I st

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] IDE that doesn't look awful?

Christopher Barker wrote: Joe Strout wrote: I'd heard good things about Wing IDE (including that it was written with wxPython, I think it was written with pyGTK, actually, which explains why it's an X app, and why it's "awful" on a Mac. Given that I'm Mr. wxPython I'm sometimes a bit embarr

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] IDE that doesn't look awful?

On Mon, 20 Oct 2008, Joe Strout wrote: I hadn't heard of Aquamacs, but even so, I remember Emacs from my college days, and I'm pretty sure it's not what I'm looking for. It probably isn't what you want, but it has changed since most peoples college days. It does have a UI now. For reference, m

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] IDE that doesn't look awful?

On Oct 20, 2008, at 3:59 PM, Kevin Walzer wrote: WingIDE is written using PyGtk, not wxPython. So yeah, it's an ugly X11 app. Ah, that explains it. There are lots of Python-aware editors out there (i.e. with syntax awareness) but nothing as slick as Xcode is for Cocoa development, and ce

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] IDE that doesn't look awful?

Joe Strout wrote: I'd heard good things about Wing IDE (including that it was written with wxPython, I think it was written with pyGTK, actually, which explains why it's an X app, and why it's "awful" on a Mac. Is there any Python IDE that looks and feels more like a proper Mac app? Komod

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] IDE that doesn't look awful?

Joe Strout wrote: Hi all, I'd heard good things about Wing IDE (including that it was written with wxPython, and I know that wxPython can make decent Mac apps with a bit of care). So I downloaded the disk image today, and man -- is it ever ugly! It's really not a Mac app at all, but an X-Wi

[Pythonmac-SIG] IDE that doesn't look awful?

Hi all, I'd heard good things about Wing IDE (including that it was written with wxPython, and I know that wxPython can make decent Mac apps with a bit of care). So I downloaded the disk image today, and man -- is it ever ugly! It's really not a Mac app at all, but an X-Window app, with

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Anyone have 10.5.5 on a G5?

On 17-Oct-08, at 1:34 PM, has wrote: Hi folks, Trying to get py-appscript 0.19.0 out the door, but I've a user reporting big problems trying to install it on their system and need to find out if it's their system or appscript that's at fault. Need a quick favour from someone with a copy o