Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] [Image-SIG] PIL binaries -- please test

2010-06-05 Thread Christopher Barker
Matthias Baas wrote: Christopher Barker wrote: Ha! I haven't had a look at selftest.py before. That script requires an inplace build which I didn't do. Instead, I was pointing PYTHONPATH inside the build directory yup -- that will confuse things. But when I link against the static lib, the te

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] [Image-SIG] PIL binaries -- please test

2010-06-05 Thread Matthias Baas
Christopher Barker wrote: >> *** PIL CORE support not installed > > That sure doesn't look good! > >> *** TKINTER support not installed >> --- JPEG support ok >> --- ZLIB (PNG/ZIP) support ok >> *** FREETYPE2 support not installed >> *** LITTLECMS support not installed > > neither do those. Ha!

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] [Image-SIG] PIL binaries -- please test

2010-06-05 Thread Christopher Barker
Matthias Baas wrote: Christopher Barker wrote: great -- are any of them running 10.4? I have little time, but here is the short version: The goal is to get a PIL binary that is statically linked to all of its dependencies, and those dependencies are all universal (32 bit PPC and Intel) and lin

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] [Image-SIG] PIL binaries -- please test

2010-06-05 Thread Matthias Baas
Christopher Barker wrote: > great -- are any of them running 10.4? > > I have little time, but here is the short version: > > The goal is to get a PIL binary that is statically linked to all of its > dependencies, and those dependencies are all universal (32 bit PPC and > Intel) and linked agains