Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Fwd: distutils and stdarg.h

2012-02-14 Thread Ned Deily
In article , "Russell E. Owen" wrote: > My symlinks are broken as you describe (though oddly > /Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.6.sdk/Library/Frameworks contains both the > symlink Frameworks->Library/Frameworks that you mentioned and also > PluginManager.framework). > > I'll fix it and try building

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Fwd: distutils and stdarg.h

2012-02-14 Thread Russell E. Owen
In article , Ned Deily wrote: >... > You *may* have run into a bug I've noticed a while back in Xcode 3.2.6. > The Xcode installer appears to screw up the symlinks to /Library within > /Developer/SDKs. The net effect is that frameworks installed in > /Library, like A/S Tcl and Tk, are not f

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Fwd: distutils and stdarg.h

2012-02-14 Thread Ned Deily
In article , "Russell E. Owen" wrote: > In article , > Ned Deily wrote: > > > In article , > > "Russell E. Owen" wrote: > > > I suggest you try one of these things: > > > - Use gcc 4.0.1 to build extensions for 32-bit python.org python. That's > > > what I'm still doing. It requires XCode

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Fwd: distutils and stdarg.h

2012-02-13 Thread Russell E. Owen
In article , Ned Deily wrote: > In article , > "Russell E. Owen" wrote: > > I suggest you try one of these things: > > - Use gcc 4.0.1 to build extensions for 32-bit python.org python. That's > > what I'm still doing. It requires XCode 3.x. > > Yes. > > > - Use gcc 4.2.1 to build extensions

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Fwd: distutils and stdarg.h

2012-02-10 Thread Chris Barker
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Chris Barker wrote: >>  If it is using C++ >> code, though, you may have to override that yourself since Python itself >> does not contain any C++ code and I don't think there is any special >> code in Distutils to override C++ stuff. > > That could be it, too. > >>

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Fwd: distutils and stdarg.h

2012-02-09 Thread Chris Barker
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Ned Deily wrote: >> 1) I thought distutils took care of calling the "right" compliler to >> match what pyotn had been built with. I guess not. > > Distutils *does* try to call the right CC compiler (that is, the > compiler the Python itself was built with), unless

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Fwd: distutils and stdarg.h

2012-02-09 Thread Ned Deily
In article , Chris Barker wrote: > On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Russell E. Owen wrote: > > > I suggest you try one of these things: > > - Use gcc 4.0.1 to build extensions for 32-bit python.org python. That's > > what I'm still doing. It requires XCode 3.x. > > Thanks -- I"ll try that. b

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Fwd: distutils and stdarg.h

2012-02-09 Thread Ned Deily
In article , "Russell E. Owen" wrote: > I suggest you try one of these things: > - Use gcc 4.0.1 to build extensions for 32-bit python.org python. That's > what I'm still doing. It requires XCode 3.x. Yes. > - Use gcc 4.2.1 to build extensions for 64-bit python.org python. Two > issues: >

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Fwd: distutils and stdarg.h

2012-02-09 Thread Chris Barker
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Russell E. Owen wrote: > I suggest you try one of these things: > - Use gcc 4.0.1 to build extensions for 32-bit python.org python. That's > what I'm still doing. It requires XCode 3.x. Thanks -- I"ll try that. but: 1) I thought distutils took care of calling th

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Fwd: distutils and stdarg.h

2012-02-09 Thread Russell E. Owen
In article , Chris Barker wrote: > darn, forgot to send to the list again -- I hate these defaults! > > > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Chris Barker > Date: Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 9:58 AM > Subject: Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] distutils and stdarg.h > To: Ronald Oussoren > > > O

[Pythonmac-SIG] Fwd: distutils and stdarg.h

2012-02-09 Thread Chris Barker
darn, forgot to send to the list again -- I hate these defaults! -- Forwarded message -- From: Chris Barker Date: Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 9:58 AM Subject: Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] distutils and stdarg.h To: Ronald Oussoren On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 11:33 PM, Ronald Oussoren wrote: >> ag