Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Status of PyObjC port to Intel OS X

2006-05-18 Thread Troy Rollins
On May 16, 2006, at 11:49 PM, Daniel Lord wrote: > Komodo is a commercial product I know but I bought Photoshop and I > figured I get more use out of Komodo so I might as well buy it. No > regrets. I have to agree. Komodo is a pretty sweet IDE. Eclipse is kind of a pig on the Mac, Komodo flies

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Status of PyObjC port to Intel OS X

2006-05-17 Thread Daniel Lord
On May 17, 2006, at 2:33, Piet van Oostrum wrote: >> Daniel Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (DL) wrote: > >> DL> Question for the group: if I modify the environment through >> os.environ >> DL> ['PATH'], will Finder applications pick that up or is it just >> for the >> DL> shell? Yes I need to R

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Status of PyObjC port to Intel OS X

2006-05-17 Thread Piet van Oostrum
> Daniel Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (DL) wrote: >DL> Question for the group: if I modify the environment through os.environ >DL> ['PATH'], will Finder applications pick that up or is it just for the >DL> shell? Yes I need to RTFM and try it, but this is a stream-of- >DL> consciousness email

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Status of PyObjC port to Intel OS X

2006-05-16 Thread Just van Rossum
Marcin Komorowski wrote: > > (...) since the only part of the Xcode tool chain I use for Python/ > > ObjC development is Interface Builder. > > > > Hey Daniel, > > What do you than use for your Python/ObjC development on a Mac? TextMate + Terminal + py2app. Oh wait, my name's not Daniel. Never

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Status of PyObjC port to Intel OS X

2006-05-16 Thread Daniel Lord
On May 16, 2006, at 17:43, Marcin Komorowski wrote: > > What do you than use for your Python/ObjC development on a Mac? Honestly, I use BBEdit as the overall text editor and I test complex Python non-GUI modules as 'stand-alone' modules using Komodo Professional (great debugger) or if they a

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Status of PyObjC port to Intel OS X

2006-05-16 Thread Marcin Komorowski
On 16-May-06, at 10:42 PM, Zachery Bir wrote: > On May 16, 2006, at 10:27 PM, Marcin Komorowski wrote: > >> What about PyOXIDE or just outright Eclipse? > > Never used either. I just don't work too well inside an IDE. Hehe... I know what you mean. I have been using VIM for all of my coding (a

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Status of PyObjC port to Intel OS X

2006-05-16 Thread Saggau
I've had some success editing the custom build command in Xcode under the Project -> Edit Active TargetBuild Tool: /usr/bin/envArguments: python2.3 "$(SOURCE_ROOT)/setup.py" py2app --aliasThis gives me python2.3 when I want to go that route.  I usually don't need it to use python2.3 now that I've

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Status of PyObjC port to Intel OS X

2006-05-16 Thread Zachery Bir
On May 16, 2006, at 10:27 PM, Marcin Komorowski wrote: > What about PyOXIDE or just outright Eclipse? Never used either. I just don't work too well inside an IDE. Zac ___ Pythonmac-SIG maillist - Pythonmac-SIG@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailm

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Status of PyObjC port to Intel OS X

2006-05-16 Thread Marcin Komorowski
What about PyOXIDE or just outright Eclipse? Marcin On 16-May-06, at 9:50 PM, Zachery Bir wrote: > On May 16, 2006, at 8:43 PM, Marcin Komorowski wrote: > >>> (...) since the only part of the Xcode tool chain I use for Python/ >>> ObjC development is Interface Builder. >> >> Hey Daniel, >> >> Wha

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Status of PyObjC port to Intel OS X

2006-05-16 Thread Zachery Bir
On May 16, 2006, at 8:43 PM, Marcin Komorowski wrote: >> (...) since the only part of the Xcode tool chain I use for Python/ >> ObjC development is Interface Builder. > > Hey Daniel, > > What do you than use for your Python/ObjC development on a Mac? Can't speak for Daniel, but I do all my develo

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Status of PyObjC port to Intel OS X

2006-05-16 Thread Marcin Komorowski
> (...) since the only part of the Xcode tool chain I use for Python/ > ObjC development is Interface Builder. > Hey Daniel, What do you than use for your Python/ObjC development on a Mac? Thanks, Marcin ___ Pythonmac-SIG maillist - Pythonmac-SIG@py

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Status of PyObjC port to Intel OS X

2006-05-16 Thread Daniel Lord
On May 16, 2006, at 16:00, Bill Janssen wrote: >>> OK, I think I will read the FAQ cover-to-cover so to speak before >>> asking another question :). >> >> Now _that's_ good Mac Python Community citizenship. > > Of course, it's a Wiki, so the next question is: Have you read it > lately? > > Bil

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Status of PyObjC port to Intel OS X

2006-05-16 Thread Bill Janssen
> > OK, I think I will read the FAQ cover-to-cover so to speak before > > asking another question :). > > Now _that's_ good Mac Python Community citizenship. Of course, it's a Wiki, so the next question is: Have you read it lately? Bill ___ Pythonmac-

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Status of PyObjC port to Intel OS X

2006-05-16 Thread Daniel Lord
On May 16, 2006, at 5:49, Marcin Komorowski wrote: > Thanks Thorsten. > > OK, I think I will read the FAQ cover-to-cover so to speak before > asking another question :). Now _that's_ good Mac Python Community citizenship. Nice to know some will actually read all that hard work of so many. Than

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Status of PyObjC port to Intel OS X

2006-05-16 Thread Daniel Lord
On May 16, 2006, at 9:52, Christopher Barker wrote: > Isn't there a way to tell XCode specifically what python you want > it to > use? I don't use XCode, so I have no idea. Since my impression is the XCode 'philosophy' to design it as a tool 'shell' using scripting to leverage command-line

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Status of PyObjC port to Intel OS X

2006-05-16 Thread Christopher Barker
Thorsten Kohnhorst wrote: > Marcin Komorowski wrote: >> how do I make XCode use python 2.4? > I am not sure if it is the best and only solution, but I used the method > described here: > > http://pythonmac.org/wiki/FAQ#head-30475a182e1542629d526567e3799ce8463517e6 but that sets user-wide enviro

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Status of PyObjC port to Intel OS X

2006-05-16 Thread Christopher Barker
Marcin Komorowski wrote: > It could be argued that if there are version > dependent scripts in OSX they really should use /usr/bin/python23 to > ensure the correct version of the interpreter. Yes, it could, and has, and it's a strong argument. > However, I will > agree, that it would not be

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Status of PyObjC port to Intel OS X

2006-05-16 Thread Marcin Komorowski
Thanks Thorsten. OK, I think I will read the FAQ cover-to-cover so to speak before asking another question :). Cheers, Marcin On 16-May-06, at 5:04 AM, Thorsten Kohnhorst wrote: > Marcin Komorowski wrote: >> Daniel, I did let the installer put python 2.4 binaries in /usr/ >> local/ bin and I

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Status of PyObjC port to Intel OS X

2006-05-16 Thread Thorsten Kohnhorst
Marcin Komorowski wrote: > Daniel, I did let the installer put python 2.4 binaries in /usr/local/ > bin and I can change the path in my shell strartup script to pull in > the 2.4 binary, but how do I make XCode use python 2.4? I am not sure if it is the best and only solution, but I used the met

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Status of PyObjC port to Intel OS X

2006-05-15 Thread Marcin Komorowski
Daniel, Bill, Thanks for your prompt replies, and Bill, yes, I should have read the FAQ before asking the question. I suspected there might be something relying on particular version within OS X itself, which is why I asked. Although, the entries in / bin are done in a 'revisioned' linked m

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Status of PyObjC port to Intel OS X

2006-05-15 Thread Daniel Lord
On May 15, 2006, at 19:11, Marcin Komorowski wrote: > Thanks to all who have replied with information, and especially to > Bob for pointing me to a location where I can find a bunch of recent > universal binary builds of python components. I have not found a > link to this page on the Internet b

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Status of PyObjC port to Intel OS X

2006-05-15 Thread Bill Janssen
> Being new to Mac > I must ask - is it safe to just point python binary links in /bin to > match those found in /usr/local/bin or should I be weary of some side > affects? Looks like the answer to this question isn't in enough places yet :-). I've updated the FAQ with the answer: Don't tr

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Status of PyObjC port to Intel OS X

2006-05-15 Thread Marcin Komorowski
Thanks to all who have replied with information, and especially to Bob for pointing me to a location where I can find a bunch of recent universal binary builds of python components. I have not found a link to this page on the Internet before, hopefully your post will help search engines fi

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Status of PyObjC port to Intel OS X

2006-05-15 Thread Thorsten Kohnhorst
Zachery Bir wrote: > I've been successfully building Universal PyObjC apps for a while > now. I've been tracking the head of PyObjC's SVN and using the > Universal Python 2.4.3 installer from python.org. > Yes, me too! The pyobjc bridge is an awsome piece of software and the trunk version w

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Status of PyObjC port to Intel OS X

2006-05-15 Thread Zachery Bir
On May 14, 2006, at 8:21 AM, Marcin Komorowski wrote: > Does anyone know what that status is of porting PyObjC to run on the > new Intel Macs? > > I know that there has already been some amount of work done, but my > attempts to run it on the new platform have failed. > > Should I be trying to be

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Status of PyObjC port to Intel OS X

2006-05-14 Thread Bob Ippolito
On May 14, 2006, at 5:31 PM, Ronald Oussoren wrote: > > On 14-mei-2006, at 14:21, Marcin Komorowski wrote: > >> Does anyone know what that status is of porting PyObjC to run on the >> new Intel Macs? >> >> I know that there has already been some amount of work done, but my >> attempts to run it o

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Status of PyObjC port to Intel OS X

2006-05-14 Thread Ronald Oussoren
On 14-mei-2006, at 14:21, Marcin Komorowski wrote: > Does anyone know what that status is of porting PyObjC to run on the > new Intel Macs? > > I know that there has already been some amount of work done, but my > attempts to run it on the new platform have failed. > > Should I be trying to be di

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Status of PyObjC port to Intel OS X

2006-05-14 Thread Daniel Lord
On May 14, 2006, at 5:21, Marcin Komorowski wrote: > Does anyone know what that status is of porting PyObjC to run on the > new Intel Macs? > > I know that there has already been some amount of work done, but my > attempts to run it on the new platform have failed. > > Should I be trying to be di

[Pythonmac-SIG] Status of PyObjC port to Intel OS X

2006-05-14 Thread Marcin Komorowski
Does anyone know what that status is of porting PyObjC to run on the new Intel Macs? I know that there has already been some amount of work done, but my attempts to run it on the new platform have failed. Should I be trying to be digging deeper into what I might be doing wrong, or is the po