Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] which fortran for pythonmac.org binaries?

2007-06-05 Thread Paul Kienzle
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 03:10:55PM -0700, Rob J Goedman wrote: On Jun 1, 2007, at 1:12 PM, Christopher Barker wrote: Paul Kienzle wrote: The gfortran at http://r.research.att.com/exp claims to build Universal Binaries, I agree that that is implied, but it also looks like there are

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] which fortran for pythonmac.org binaries?

2007-06-04 Thread Christopher Barker
Robert Kern wrote: And, if you copy the libgfortran.a file to somewhere else, say ~/staticlibs/, you can force the linker to use it instead of the .dylib such that your users don't need to install gfortran. Problem solved. Finally. Fabulous! Thanks Robert. Is anyone planning on building a

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] which fortran for pythonmac.org binaries?

2007-06-03 Thread Christopher Barker
Rob J Goedman wrote: Building universal R is done by compliling two R binaries and setting r_arch parameter to ppc and i386 respectively, along with the proper compiler flags. Those two builds can then be installed into the same framework location, R install process merges them

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] which fortran for pythonmac.org binaries?

2007-06-03 Thread Robert Kern
Christopher Barker wrote: So does that mean we can build Universal binaries of Scipy now? With some fiddling, probably. And back to the original question -- is the binary at python mac (only 2.4 at my last look) Universal? Almost certainly not. -- Robert Kern I have come to believe that

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] which fortran for pythonmac.org binaries?

2007-06-03 Thread Robert Kern
Robert Kern wrote: Robert Kern wrote: Christopher Barker wrote: So does that mean we can build Universal binaries of Scipy now? With some fiddling, probably. Namely, $ LDFLAGS=-undefined dynamic_lookup -bundle -arch i386 -arch ppc python setup.py config_fc --fcompiler=gnu95

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] which fortran for pythonmac.org binaries?

2007-06-02 Thread Rob J Goedman
Agreed, the compiler can compile binaries for multiple architectures (we use that all the time). On that same website ( http:// r.research.att.com/ ): Building universal R is done by compliling two R binaries and setting r_arch parameter to ppc and i386 respectively, along with the proper

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] which fortran for pythonmac.org binaries?

2007-06-01 Thread Paul Kienzle
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 10:03:02AM -0700, Christopher Barker wrote: Paul Kienzle wrote: I've downloaded scipy for python2.4 from pythonmac.org today: http://pythonmac.org/packages/py24-fat/index.html hmm. I wonder who built that? As far as I know, non one has figured out how to

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] which fortran for pythonmac.org binaries?

2007-06-01 Thread Christopher Barker
Paul Kienzle wrote: The gfortran at http://r.research.att.com/exp claims to build Universal Binaries, I agree that that is implied, but it also looks like there are passing only one architecture flag in their build instructions. I haven't seen any other reference to gfortran building

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] which fortran for pythonmac.org binaries?

2007-06-01 Thread Rob J Goedman
I don't think that is implied on Simon's R website. The context of the statement is building universal packages for the R statistical software system. Within that context the compiler inter-works with the latest set of Xcode tools to build a package (if the package includes Fortran in

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] which fortran for pythonmac.org binaries?

2007-06-01 Thread Christopher Barker
Rob J Goedman wrote: Hope this helps a bit, not much, but I don't need to get how R works. It seems there is still no Fortran compiler for OS-X that build universal binary libs -- too bad. -CHB -- Christopher Barker, Ph.D. Oceanographer Emergency Response Division NOAA/NOS/ORR

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] which fortran for pythonmac.org binaries?

2007-06-01 Thread Robert Kern
Christopher Barker wrote: Rob J Goedman wrote: Hope this helps a bit, not much, but I don't need to get how R works. It seems there is still no Fortran compiler for OS-X that build universal binary libs -- too bad. The gfortran binary that Paul pointed you to does make Universal

[Pythonmac-SIG] which fortran for pythonmac.org binaries?

2007-05-29 Thread Paul Kienzle
Hi, I've downloaded scipy for python2.4 from pythonmac.org today: http://pythonmac.org/packages/py24-fat/index.html and saw the following problem: File ../chisq.py, line 6, in ? import scipy.interpolate File

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] which fortran for pythonmac.org binaries?

2007-05-29 Thread Christopher Barker
Paul Kienzle wrote: I've downloaded scipy for python2.4 from pythonmac.org today: http://pythonmac.org/packages/py24-fat/index.html hmm. I wonder who built that? As far as I know, non one has figured out how to build SciPy Universally -- non one has got gfortran or g95 to build