On 28-mrt-2006, at 1:18, Bob Ippolito wrote:
>
> On Mar 27, 2006, at 2:55 PM, Christopher Barker wrote:
>
>> Bob Ippolito wrote:
>>
>>> That whole section really needs to be restructured to address the
>>> common questions and issues people have regarding finding the right
>>> packages for them.
> - Original Message -
> From: "Ronald Oussoren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Pythonmac-SIG Digest, Vol 35, Issue 51
> Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 09:38:11 +0200
>
> Sigh, the universal python build already runs on 10.3.9 and
> supports ppc and i
> - Original Message -
> From: "Bob Ippolito" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Pythonmac-SIG Digest, Vol 35, Issue 51
> Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 17:44:13 -0800
>
>
>
> On Mar 27, 2006, at 5:10 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >> From: Christopher
On 28-mrt-2006, at 17:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: "Ronald Oussoren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Pythonmac-SIG Digest, Vol 35, Issue 51
>> Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 09:38:11 +0200
>>
>> Sigh, the universal py
Ronald Oussoren wrote:
> Before anyone starts coding, what should happen when you double-click
> on an egg? I'd say this should bring up a dialog that allows you to
> install the egg and possibly set some options. Installation will be done
> using easy_install.
That sounds good to me.
Does easy-
Ronald Oussoren wrote:
> For casual users it is easier to install mpkgs, hence we'll need
> mpkgs until someone writes the tool that allows one to double-click
> on eggs to install them. I'm tempted to do so myself just to avoid
> packaging stuff twice :-)
>
> Mpkgs have another advantage: they a
On 28-mrt-2006, at 18:26, Christopher Barker wrote:
> Ronald Oussoren wrote:
>
>> For casual users it is easier to install mpkgs, hence we'll need
>> mpkgs until someone writes the tool that allows one to double-click
>> on eggs to install them. I'm tempted to do so myself just to avoid
>> packag
> Couldn't we put a *.egg into a *.mpkg? and get the best of both worlds?
That would be my vote.
Bill
___
Pythonmac-SIG maillist - [email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonmac-sig
On 28-mrt-2006, at 18:20, Christopher Barker wrote:
> Ronald Oussoren wrote:
>
>> Before anyone starts coding, what should happen when you double-click
>> on an egg? I'd say this should bring up a dialog that allows you to
>> install the egg and possibly set some options. Installation will
>> b
Hi,
I am totally confused by all the versions and name conflicts of py-
sqlite and sqlite not to mention the python version confusion. What
I really want to do is use both sqlite version 2 and sqlite version 3
since I have existing sqlite version2 DBs and new CoreData apps that
use sqlite
On 3/28/06, Dan Grassi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am totally confused by all the versions and name conflicts of py-
> sqlite and sqlite not to mention the python version confusion. What
> I really want to do is use both sqlite version 2 and sqlite version 3
> since I have existing sqli
On 28 Mar 2006, at 1320, Dan Grassi wrote:
> All in all the whole Python database (lack of) mess is ridiculous! I
> know that Guido does not feel that databases have any place in python
> but I don't get it, why does the "batteries included" not include
> database support, databases like MySQL,
Hi all,
I'm embarking on the project of building the various packages I need
with the new Universal Build. I've set up a Wiki page to keep track of
what I (and others) have done. Please take a look if you are interested,
and add your own work.
http://pythonmac.org/wiki/UniversalPackages
-Chr
13 matches
Mail list logo
