On Tue, 2016-09-27 at 09:34 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> Move to Pagure. I can do it right away if nobody objects, I've already set up
> a group:
> https://pagure.io/group/fedora-qa
Only note I'd have is it'd be best to just check in with sumantro and
a2batic first, since they're working on the p
On Tue, 2016-09-27 at 09:34 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> A slightly off topic, Adam, would you happen to know why Fedora
> doesn't self-host Pagure under say https://apps.fedoraproject.org/pag
> ure , which would allow e.g. FAS group integration (unlike now, when
> we need to mirror our FAS groups
> If grouping at submission is the concern here, then it would be more than
> easy to do - the idea here (maybe I did not communicate it properly) was to
> use the ExecDB generated UUID as the identifier, the same way we do in the
> whole stack.
> Since the Groups can be created "on the fly" (meani
> We still have a few miscellaneous things hosted in:
>
> https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/fedora-qa.git
>
> since fedorahosted is dying next February, what should we do with them?
Move to Pagure. I can do it right away if nobody objects, I've already set up a
group:
https://pagure.io/group/fe
> > I submitted a revision today which makes some slight modification to
> > how the doit.py script is building docs, rpms and tarballs.
> >
> > https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/D1012
> >
> > My intention is to get this deployed to a non-staging setup soon but I
> > wanted to reach ou
> Hello fine fellows,
I hoped somebody else would reply, seems not :( To clarify, I and Dodji already
talked about this on IRC, and I asked him to send an email here to gather more
feedback. I'll summarize my thoughts here now, hopefully somebody else will
comment on that as well.
> The less g
