> > == Namespace structure ==
> >
> > We'll be providing some top-level namespaces (list not yet final):
> > * app
> > * fedoraqa
> > * package
> > * scratch (?)
> >
> > These will the further split to facilitate for a finer level of
> > granularity, e.g.:
> >
> > app
> >
> > check - FAILED
> > subcheck1 - PASSED
> > subcheck2 - PASSED
> > subcheck3 - FAILED
> > subcheck4 - PASSED
> >
> > !IMPORTANT: ResultsDB will not be responsible for computing the
> > result value for an "upper level" Result from the subchecks - this is
> > t
On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 06:54:17 -0500 (EST)
Josef Skladanka wrote:
>
> == Namespace structure ==
>
> We'll be providing some top-level namespaces (list not yet final):
> * app
> * fedoraqa
> * package
> * scratch (?)
>
> These will the further split to facilitate for a finer level of
On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 06:54:17 -0500 (EST)
Josef Skladanka wrote:
> This is an initial take on stuff that was discussed in person during
> Tim's stay in Brno. Sending to the list for additional
> discussion/fine-tuning.
> = What =
>
> Talking rpmgrill-like checks, there will be a need to be able t
> This is an initial take on stuff that was discussed in person during Tim's
> stay in Brno. Sending to the list for additional discussion/fine-tuning.
>
> = What =
>
> Talking rpmgrill-like checks, there will be a need to be able to facilitate
> some kind of structure for representing that a ch
This is an initial take on stuff that was discussed in person during Tim's
stay in Brno. Sending to the list for additional discussion/fine-tuning.
= What =
Talking rpmgrill-like checks, there will be a need to be able to facilitate
some kind of structure for representing that a check is compose
