> - Are we OK with saying "anything run by libtaskotron has to be gpl3
> compatible"? This gets into another area that I'm personally fuzzy
> on (the line between derivative and usage) but I don't know of any
> gpl2-only or agpl libraries that we'd want to use with libtaskotron
>
On Mon, 12 May 2014 22:00:33 -0600
Tim Flink wrote:
> One of the things that I've wanted for taskotron is to keep the
> directive documentation inside the code for those directives - similar
> to how ansible does their documentation for modules [1].
>
> [1] http://docs.ansible.com/modules_by_cat
One of the things that I've wanted for taskotron is to keep the
directive documentation inside the code for those directives - similar
to how ansible does their documentation for modules [1].
[1] http://docs.ansible.com/modules_by_category.html
Mike has been working on some code to make that happ
