On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 2:29 PM Josef Skladanka wrote:
> > Orphaning python-mongoquery and retiring everything else makes sense to
> > me.
> >
> > Tim
>
> +1
>
OK, I'll make it happen.
___
qa-devel mailing list -- qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To un
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 7:11 PM Tim Flink wrote:
>
> On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 18:25:17 +0100
> Kamil Paral wrote:
>
> > Note: The email subject should have said "retiring" instead of
> > "orphaning". There is little reason to orphan them, retiring is the
> > right approach here. Perhaps except for mon
On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 18:25:17 +0100
Kamil Paral wrote:
> Note: The email subject should have said "retiring" instead of
> "orphaning". There is little reason to orphan them, retiring is the
> right approach here. Perhaps except for mongoquery, somebody else
> could be interested in maintaining tha
On 11/16/20 2:07 PM, Kamil Paral wrote:
I just know that sometimes the retirement process does not happen automatically
and the packages linger
When that happens, please let me know. For the past ~2 years, I am the
retirement process.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 8:27 AM František Zatloukal
wrote:
> The "correct" way to do this is to use orphaning procedure. This way,
> anybody interested will have enough time to take over the to-be removed
> packages.
>
"When Fedora maintainers do not want or are not able to maintain a package
an
On 11/16/20 8:25 AM, František Zatloukal wrote:
Note: The email subject should have said "retiring" instead of
"orphaning".
There is little reason to orphan them, retiring is the right approach here.
Perhaps except for mongoquery, somebody else could be interested in
maintaining that, so that one
> Note: The email subject should have said "retiring" instead of
> "orphaning".
> There is little reason to orphan them, retiring is the right approach here.
> Perhaps except for mongoquery, somebody else could be interested in
> maintaining that, so that one should be orphaned instead.
The "corre
Note: The email subject should have said "retiring" instead of "orphaning".
There is little reason to orphan them, retiring is the right approach here.
Perhaps except for mongoquery, somebody else could be interested in
maintaining that, so that one should be orphaned instead.
_
Hello,
our Taskotron-related repositories (with exceptions like resultsdb) have
been marked as EOL and archived more than half a year ago. I believe it's
time to also tidy up our rpm packages in Fedora.
Looking at our group ownership [1] I have identified the following rpms
which could be retired:
