Re: To RHEL or Not to RHEL?

2015-05-13 Thread Kamil Paral
> * Will need to be more diligent about keeping dev/stg on > updates-testing so that we don't get any nasty surprises in production I don't have much advice about the other points, but this one caught my attention. Do we really need to use updates-testing for dev/stg? That might be quite probl

Re: To RHEL or Not to RHEL?

2015-05-13 Thread Martin Krizek
- Original Message - > From: "Tim Flink" > To: qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2015 8:05:04 PM > Subject: To RHEL or Not to RHEL? ...snip... > While virt-in-virt is possible, I'd prefer to avoid the extra > complexity and performance penalty and figure that runni

Re: CI for Taskotron and Related Projects

2015-05-13 Thread Kamil Paral
> I've just re-started the CI on qadevel (the future one, not cloud) that > mkrizek set up a while back. It was destroyed when I started working on > replacing qadevel.cloud but never finished it. > > The link is: > > https://qadevel.fedoraproject.org/buildmaster/waterfall Great. Just to refresh

Re: CI for Taskotron and Related Projects

2015-05-13 Thread Martin Krizek
- Original Message - > From: "Kamil Paral" > To: "Fedora QA Development" > Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2015 3:38:41 PM > Subject: Re: CI for Taskotron and Related Projects > > > I've just re-started the CI on qadevel (the future one, not cloud) that > > mkrizek set up a while back. It was d

Re: CI for Taskotron and Related Projects

2015-05-13 Thread Kamil Paral
> IIRC it doesn't send notifications. We might enable sending e-mail to the > author of a commit that breaks tests (if possible). Thoughts? That would be a great feature! :-) I'd prefer to also CC qa-devel (might be obtrusive for subscribers) or sysadmin-qa-members, just to be sure we're informe

Re: CI for Taskotron and Related Projects

2015-05-13 Thread Tim Flink
On Wed, 13 May 2015 09:38:41 -0400 (EDT) Kamil Paral wrote: > > Note that there will be ssl cert warnings since it's self signed. > > Once the thing gets rebuilt for real, those ssl warnings will go > > away. > > Not sure if it is intentional, but plain http does not work, the > connection is

Re: To RHEL or Not to RHEL?

2015-05-13 Thread Tim Flink
On Tue, 12 May 2015 17:34:24 -0600 Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Mon, 11 May 2015 17:16:09 -0600 > Tim Flink wrote: > > > On Mon, 11 May 2015 13:09:33 -0600 > > Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > > On Sat, 9 May 2015 12:05:04 -0600 > > > Tim Flink wrote: > > > > > > > This was brought up a little while a

Re: To RHEL or Not to RHEL?

2015-05-13 Thread Tim Flink
On Wed, 13 May 2015 08:45:08 -0400 (EDT) Kamil Paral wrote: > > * Will need to be more diligent about keeping dev/stg on > > updates-testing so that we don't get any nasty surprises in > > production > > I don't have much advice about the other points, but this one caught > my attention. Do we

Re: To RHEL or Not to RHEL?

2015-05-13 Thread Tim Flink
On Wed, 13 May 2015 09:31:48 -0400 (EDT) Martin Krizek wrote: > - Original Message - > > From: "Tim Flink" > > To: qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > Sent: Saturday, May 9, 2015 8:05:04 PM > > Subject: To RHEL or Not to RHEL? > > ...snip... > > While virt-in-virt is possible, I'd pref