> Do I understand correctly that you use self-built QtC and you built
it using Qbs?
Yes. Moreover, Qbs is also self-built :))
> My understanding is that RUNPATH only affects libraries with a NEEDED
entry, i.e. direct dependencies, while RPATH covers indirect
dependencies as well.
Here says abo
On 10/26/22 13:24, Иван Комиссаров wrote:
I think, both RPATH and RUNPATH should work.
My understanding is that RUNPATH only affects libraries with a NEEDED
entry, i.e. direct dependencies, while RPATH covers indirect
dependencies as well. What I don't understand is why Pavel's linker uses
R
I think, both RPATH and RUNPATH should work.
Do I understand correctly that you use self-built QtC and you built it using
Qbs?
In that case, that might be a bug in how QtC project overrides Qbs rpaths.
Ivan
> 26 окт. 2022 г., в 12:15, Карелин Павел написал(а):
>
> Christian, does it make sen
Christian, does it make sense to add construct
cpp.driverLinkerFlags: [
"-Wl,--disable-new-dtags",
]
to the project code QBS?
Or is this problem on Ubuntu only I have?
On the other hand, the people on the internet writes that RUNPATH is a
more correct approach (for example here:
http
