On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 10:00:33AM +1200, Christian Gagneraud wrote:
> On Thu, 16 May 2019 at 09:32, Иван Комиссаров wrote:
> > > 15 мая 2019 г., в 19:50, André Pönitz написал(а):
> > >
> > > Getting rid of implicitly shared containers should be a rather
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 11:38:25AM +0200, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> [...]
> jake had started that "qt-free qbs" project (he got as far as
> eliminating (most) use of qt containers), but it was snuffed out because
> it was unrealistic and counterproductive at that time. even now, no
> patches in t
On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 08:42:50PM +0200, Richard Weickelt wrote:
> Tobias,
>
> I think it is of utmost importance for the survival of Qbs that it is
> fully supported by an IDE like QtCreator.
>
> > Note that this is about the build system used to *build Qt Creator
> > with*, not about *build sy
On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 09:10:32PM +0300, Denis Shienkov wrote:
> > For c++ - yes. Imagine a pure javascript rule that doesn’t invoke any
> «compiler» (like cl or javac) but converts some input to output using qbs
> itself. How that custom rule would like?
>
> But we speak about c/c++ :)
>
> > Wh
