Am 23.11.2022 um 18:04 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben:
> On 11/23/22 14:45, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > I think this means that if we clean up everything, in the end we'll have
> > coroutine_wrapper and coroutine_wrapper_bdrv (the fourth version not in
> > the above list, but that Paolo mentioned we may
On 11/23/22 14:45, Kevin Wolf wrote:
I think this means that if we clean up everything, in the end we'll have
coroutine_wrapper and coroutine_wrapper_bdrv (the fourth version not in
the above list, but that Paolo mentioned we may want to have).
Yes, I agree.
The only thing I'm unsure about
Am 23.11.2022 um 12:45 hat Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito geschrieben:
>
>
> Am 18/11/2022 um 11:57 schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
> > On 11/16/22 15:07, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
> >> Here we introduce generated_co_wrapper_simple, a simplification of
> >> g_c_w that
> >> only considers the case
Am 18/11/2022 um 11:57 schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
> On 11/16/22 15:07, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
>> Here we introduce generated_co_wrapper_simple, a simplification of
>> g_c_w that
>> only considers the case where the caller is not in a coroutine.
>> This simplifies and clarifies a lot when
Ok, as I expected simple changes in a previous based-on serie provoke a
cascade of changes that inevitably affect these patches too.
While I strongly suggest to have an initial look at these patches
because it gives an idea on what am I trying to accomplish, I would not
go looking at nitpicks and
On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 4:01 PM Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
wrote:
> > - generated_co_wrapper_simple -> coroutine_wrapper
> > - generated_co_wrapper_blk -> coroutine_wrapper_mixed
> > - generated_co_wrapper -> coroutine_wrapper_mixed_bdrv
> >
> > ? It is not clear to me yet if you will have
Am 18/11/2022 um 11:57 schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
> On 11/16/22 15:07, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
>> Here we introduce generated_co_wrapper_simple, a simplification of
>> g_c_w that
>> only considers the case where the caller is not in a coroutine.
>> This simplifies and clarifies a lot when
On 11/16/22 15:07, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
Here we introduce generated_co_wrapper_simple, a simplification of g_c_w that
only considers the case where the caller is not in a coroutine.
This simplifies and clarifies a lot when the caller is a coroutine or not, and
in the future will
Please read "Protect the block layer with a rwlock: part 1" and
"Protect the block layer with a rwlock: part 2" for an
additional introduction and aim of this series.
In this serie, we cover the remaining BlockDriver IO callbacks that were not
running in coroutine, therefore not using the graph
