On 9/25/19 6:20 AM, Sam Eiderman wrote:
> Thanks Thomas,
>
> Resubmitting the tests, all other code will remain the same.
>
> Sam
>
OK, feel free to just send the test by itself if only patch 8/8 changes.
--js
Thanks Thomas,
Resubmitting the tests, all other code will remain the same.
Sam
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 10:58 AM Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 24/09/2019 20.49, John Snow wrote:
> > Nobody was making movement on this patch series, and in response to Max
> > acking the whole series, I was just going
On 24/09/2019 20.49, John Snow wrote:
> Nobody was making movement on this patch series, and in response to Max
> acking the whole series, I was just going to send a pull request for the
> whole thing and see who barked, because nobody likes or hates this
> series enough to offer any feedback.
>
Nobody was making movement on this patch series, and in response to Max
acking the whole series, I was just going to send a pull request for the
whole thing and see who barked, because nobody likes or hates this
series enough to offer any feedback.
Unfortunately, it's rotted on the vine a bit and
Gentle ping
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019, 11:24 Sam Eiderman wrote:
> v1:
>
> Non-standard logical geometries break under QEMU.
>
> A virtual disk which contains an operating system which depends on
> logical geometries (consistent values being reported from BIOS INT13
> AH=08) will most likely break
v1:
Non-standard logical geometries break under QEMU.
A virtual disk which contains an operating system which depends on
logical geometries (consistent values being reported from BIOS INT13
AH=08) will most likely break under QEMU/SeaBIOS if it has non-standard
logical geometries - for example