Blue Swirl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Last time I missed a lot of the functions, this version should be complete.
I see no difference in operation with or without the patch. Comments?
Other than it didn't apply against the current CVS? Was there a requirement
for a previous patch you
Fabrice Bellard wrote:
Hi,
Concerning the QEMU GUI, my mind slightly evolved since my last posts on
the topic: I think that a wxWidgets GUI would be the best as it is
reasonnably portable and because it uses the native GUIs.
wx is nasty at best.
--
Luca Barbato
Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC
On 6/21/06, Fabrice Bellard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Concerning the QEMU GUI, my mind slightly evolved since my last posts on
the topic: I think that a wxWidgets GUI would be the best as it is
reasonnably portable and because it uses the native GUIs.
If someone is interested, I am ready to
Other than it didn't apply against the current CVS? Was there a
requirement
for a previous patch you posted which hasn't been applied to CVS?
Fabrice applied it yesterday.
_
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger!
Fix the BPr instruction branch target calculation.
Index: qemu/target-sparc/translate.c
===
--- qemu.orig/target-sparc/translate.c 2006-06-22 14:50:51.0 +
+++ qemu/target-sparc/translate.c 2006-06-22
Raphaël Rigo wrote:
Fabrice Bellard wrote:
Another point is that doing:
+target_long args[6];
+
+tputl(args, arg1);
+tputl(args+1, arg2);
+tputl(args+2, arg3);
+tputl(args+3, arg4);
+tputl(args+4, arg5);
+tputl(args+5, arg6);
at the start of every syscall
Hi,
If people are interested, we could try to port Q as a base, since
it's going to be obsolete anyway (either by the new QEMU GUI or
leopard)... :)
I would be in a GUI that is not specific to QEMU. e.g. Xen/VT, Basilisk
II, SheepShaver, etc. ;-)
That could imply the use of an internal
Hi,
If people are interested, we could try to port Q as a base, since
it's going to be obsolete anyway (either by the new QEMU GUI or
leopard)... :)
I would be interested in a GUI that is not specific to QEMU. e.g. Xen/VT,
Basilisk II, SheepShaver, etc. ;-)
That could imply the use of an
Has anyone gotten this to work? I'm probably missing something obvious.
Here's the command line I'm using (on linux with a CVS from today):
qemu -hda disk0.img -net nic,model=rtl8139 -net user -m 512 -soundhw
sb16
Vista is installed and I manually set the IP to 10.0.2.15 and the
gateway to
On Thursday 22 June 2006 20:45, Brian Wheeler wrote:
Has anyone gotten this to work? I'm probably missing something obvious.
Here's the command line I'm using (on linux with a CVS from today):
qemu -hda disk0.img -net nic,model=rtl8139 -net user -m 512 -soundhw
sb16
Could be a bug in the
Is anybody working on creating an EHCI driver for the USB subsystem? I
have a need to access high speed devices and wanted to find out if I'd
be re-inventing the wheel before I start on this.
--
Don Dugger
Censeo Toto nos in Kansa esse decisse. - D. Gale
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ph: (303)440-1368
Hi all, I'm working a project which develops Qemu running on MinGW/MSys but I don't know which IDE I should use to develop, to test, to debug Qemu source code: 1. I should use VC++ on Windows: in this case, I must configure VC++ to use mingw-gcc (in place of the default compiler of VC++. In
Fabrice Bellard wrote:
Hi,
Concerning the QEMU GUI, my mind slightly evolved since my last posts
on the topic: I think that a wxWidgets GUI would be the best as it is
reasonnably portable and because it uses the native GUIs.
I think the first step is to validate whether wxWidgets will be
2. OR: I should develop Qemu on Linux and use KDevelop IDE.
And I can do all with KDevelop: develop, test, debug Qemu. And if I want
Qemu running on MinGW/MSys, I must transfer the souce code, which were
already developped with KDevelop, to Windows installed MinGW/MSys and
recompile
Paul Brook wrote:
qemu -hda disk0.img -net nic,model=rtl8139 -net user -m 512 -soundhw
sb16
Could be a bug in the rtl8139 emulation. I couldn't get it to work with the
Realtek drivers.
Unofortunately rtl8139 is the only NIC supported by vista, among those
provided by QEMU. I obtained the best
On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 16:50:10 -0500
Anthony Liguori [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fabrice Bellard wrote:
Hi,
Concerning the QEMU GUI, my mind slightly evolved since my last
posts on the topic: I think that a wxWidgets GUI would be the best
as it is reasonnably portable and because it uses
16 matches
Mail list logo
