Hi
This is the patch which appends optional stfiwx PowerPC instruction into QEMU. For
demonstration purpose you can use attached stfiwx_cast.c code. But i'm still having problems with
gen_op_load_fpr_FT1(rS(ctx-opcode)); macro which loads fpr[rS(ctx-opcode] into
internal FT1 register. When
Rob Landley wrote:
On Sunday 08 October 2006 10:36 am, Jim C. Brown wrote:
qemu is primarily a dynamic translator not a virtualizer.
That's an implementation detail. The end result is running programs in a
virtual environment, and qemu's system emulation has lots of virtual hardware
it
Hi,
I get this error, when I don't give qemu a 'hda':
A disk image must be given for 'hda' when booting a Linux kernel.
Why is that? Isn't it completely legal to start without a IDE drive? For
example with:
qemu \
-kernel linux-test/bzImage-2.6.18 \
-append root=/dev/nfs
On Monday 09 October 2006 8:08 am, Jim C. Brown wrote:
On Mon, Oct 09, 2006 at 12:05:02AM -0400, Rob Landley wrote:
qemu is primarily a dynamic translator not a virtualizer.
That's an implementation detail. The end result is running programs in a
virtual environment, and qemu's system
On Tuesday 10 October 2006 5:26 am, Joshua Root wrote:
Part of the generally accepted definition of virtualization is that the
majority of guest instructions execute directly on the real CPU with no
intervention by the VMM. QEMU + qvm86 does count as virtualization if
the system spends most of
On Tuesday 10 October 2006 11:46 am, Markus Schiltknecht wrote:
Hi,
I get this error, when I don't give qemu a 'hda':
Use /dev/zero. (Several people have suggested that qemu should default
to /dev/zero when you give it a kernel but don't give it a hard drive, but
last I checked it still
Rob Landley wrote:
Because the way -kernel works is to create a fake bootsector internally,
present it to the bios as the start of hda, and tell the bios to boot from
that. If you haven't got an hda, it gets confused. (It probably shouldn't,
since it's not actually _using_ it, but it does.)
Is it possible to boot the iso image
debian-31r3-sparc-netinst.iso
in qemu-system-sparc? What about other
Linux distributions?
-ishwar
___
Qemu-devel mailing list
Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 11:48:33AM -0400, Rob Landley wrote:
Here you are using the terms virtual and emulated interchangably. That's
ok as long as the difference between virtualization and virtual/emulated is
understood.
Well, the hardware people see a huge difference. To them one is
Ishwar Rattan wrote:
Is it possible to boot the iso image
debian-31r3-sparc-netinst.iso
in qemu-system-sparc? What about other
Linux distributions?
I haven't tried it. But I'd be curious to hear how it works for you.
--rich
___
Qemu-devel
I've booted both aurora sparc linux 2.0-rcsomething and the last
sparc32 gentoo iso available (install-sparc-universal-2004.1.iso).
They both work to a certian point. There are still bugs to be fixed
/ uncovered.
WD
On 10/10/06, K. Richard Pixley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ishwar Rattan wrote:
On Tue, 10 Oct 2006, WaxDragon wrote:
I've booted both aurora sparc linux 2.0-rcsomething and the last
sparc32 gentoo iso available (install-sparc-universal-2004.1.iso).
They both work to a certian point. There are still bugs to be fixed
/ uncovered.
Can you give some more information on
Is it possible to boot the iso image
debian-31r3-sparc-netinst.iso
in qemu-system-sparc? What about other
Linux distributions?
In serial console mode it should boot and the install should finish (Qemu
CVS version), at least on 3.1r1 full CD.
I made some tests a while ago, here are the
For nearly 6 years on of the applications i wrote exhibited incorrect
behavior on the systems running X with MSB byte/bit order. And today
i finally nailed it down, all thanks to the work of Fabrice Bellard
and Blue Swirl.
Thanks. Out of curiosity, how did you debug the software with Qemu? What
Well here is the situation. Dept had a lab with SPARC
based Solaris machines that were phased out in summer
(over my objections). I needed the environment to teach
first computer archt course with some assembly language
thrown in. Intel processor assembly requires a much
bigger effort (on part
Ishwar Rattan wrote:
Well here is the situation. Dept had a lab with SPARC
based Solaris machines that were phased out in summer
(over my objections). I needed the environment to teach
first computer archt course with some assembly language
thrown in. Intel processor assembly requires a much
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 12:40:53PM -0400, Ishwar Rattan wrote:
Is it possible to boot the iso image
debian-31r3-sparc-netinst.iso
in qemu-system-sparc? What about other
Linux distributions?
I haven't tried this one, but the debian-installer from Etch. It is
possible to install a full
On Tuesday 10 October 2006 21:44, Ishwar Rattan wrote:
Well here is the situation. Dept had a lab with SPARC
based Solaris machines that were phased out in summer
(over my objections). I needed the environment to teach
first computer archt course with some assembly language
thrown in. Intel
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 10:03:26PM -0400, Rob Landley wrote:
That is not how he uses the terms. He uses them interchangably.
B) The people I've seen care about this are embedded system developers, who
also make a distinction between emulator and simulator. (One is a
hardware board that
19 matches
Mail list logo
