hi,
When I am trying to using kqemu on my IA32 linux, it throws out "Could
not initialize SDL -- exiting".
Could you help me to figure it out?
Thanks,
Neo
--
I would remember that if researchers were not ambitious
probably today we haven't the technology we are using!
> > In theory most of the bits should be there. However I don't have
> > big-endian hardware to test against,
>
> I had a look at the "integrator cp" user guide. This board and the related
> core modules are supposed to be able to work in big endian mode (even if
> some components are not compatibl
Do you have plan to multi-thread?
2007/4/28, Paul Brook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Friday 27 April 2007, Jonathan Kalbfeld wrote:
> Suppose I run QEMU on a T1000 with an 8-way CPU and I tell it to
simulate
> 8x SMP. WIll it spawn a separate thread for each dynamic translation
> activity?
No. qem
Hi,
Many thanks for your answer.
> > I have a question concerning the system emulation features : what is
> > missing in the implementation of qemu to get a system emulation of a big
> > endian ARM1026 target (like qemu-armeb for user emulation) ?
>
> In theory most of the bits should be there. H
On Friday 27 April 2007, Jonathan Kalbfeld wrote:
> Suppose I run QEMU on a T1000 with an 8-way CPU and I tell it to simulate
> 8x SMP. WIll it spawn a separate thread for each dynamic translation
> activity?
No. qemu is single-threaded.
Paul
Suppose I run QEMU on a T1000 with an 8-way CPU and I tell it to simulate 8x
SMP. WIll it spawn a separate thread for each dynamic translation activity?
jonathan
--
--
Jonathan Kalbfeld
+1 323 620 6682
The host system is Pentium 4 runing Linux.
Qemu is qemu-0.9.0 (snapshot 4/26)
I tried the net-installs:
debian-40r0-sparc-netinst.iso
and
debian-testing-sparc-netinst.iso
both stop at random points during the
step installing the systsem:
error seen:
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer de
I think I could not explain my question regarding "addl %ebx, (%eax)".
What I wanted to ask was that this instruction also accesses the memory and
I also need to intercept it within a transaction. Incase of "addl %ebx,
(%eax)", Are the functions under "/* CPU memory access without any memory or
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 08:24:28PM -0400, ISHWAR RATTAN wrote:
> Has any one had success with this install? It seems to
> fail all the time even with -nographic option (this worked
> for 3.1r1)?
Which port? i386, amd64, arm, mips(el), sparc or ppc?
How are you booting the installer? I.e. which
