Here is a trivial patch to make only use of posix types in drivers, not
types from the softfloat header.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Thibault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: hw/rtl8139.c
===
RCS file: /sources/qemu/qemu/hw/rtl8139.c,v
retrieving
block-raw.c currently doesn't cope with partial reads and writes, here
is a patch.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Thibault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: block-raw.c
===
RCS file: /sources/qemu/qemu/block-raw.c,v
retrieving revision 1.25
diff -u
CVSROOT:/sources/qemu
Module name:qemu
Changes by: Thiemo Seufer ths 07/11/09 17:52:11
Modified files:
hw : mips_malta.c mips_mipssim.c mips_r4k.c
target-mips: cpu.h
Log message:
Move kernel loader parameters from the cpu state to
CVSROOT:/sources/qemu
Module name:qemu
Changes by: Thiemo Seufer ths 07/11/09 18:17:50
Modified files:
hw : rtl8139.c
Log message:
Fix typo, spotted by Samuel Thibault.
CVSWeb URLs:
On Thu, 8 Nov 2007, Kyle Kilpatrick wrote:
Hello. First, let me say that I realize this is not exactly the place
for this. Non-developer problems with Qemu should go on the Qemu
forum... But they're down right now, so please bear with me here. I
apologize for taking up all you developers'
CVSROOT:/cvsroot/qemu
Module name:qemu
Changes by: Blue Swirl blueswir1 07/11/09 19:08:43
Modified files:
target-sparc : translate.c
Log message:
More CPU definitions
CVSWeb URLs:
On Thursday 08 November 2007 10:51:01 pm Kyle Kilpatrick wrote:
Hello. First, let me say that I realize this is not exactly the place for
this. Non-developer problems with Qemu should go on the Qemu forum... But
they're down right now, so please bear with me here. I apologize for
taking up
Any comments on this?, is ignoring unknown parameters to configure a feature
as I suspect to prevent build failures on users that assume that it is
autoconf based and try to enforce the defaults with an unknown option like
--enable-sdl?
Carlo
- Forwarded message from Carlo Marcelo Arenas
On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 23:37 +, Paul Brook wrote:
I can check the hypervisor feature is not present, for emulating PowerPC
620 on a target that would have hypervisor emulation support. But I
cannot do as if the CPU do not have the feature if it's actually
available. The PowerPC 64
What about this patch ? Is there any remark ? Is it to be applied ?
Forwarded Message
From: J. Mayer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] multiple boot devices
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2007 14:04:40 +0100
On Sat,
On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 00:05 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 09:01:13PM +0100, J. Mayer wrote:
On Sat, 2007-11-03 at 22:28 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 02:06:04PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 06:35:48PM +0100,
CVSROOT:/sources/qemu
Module name:qemu
Changes by: Thiemo Seufer ths 07/11/09 23:09:41
Modified files:
target-mips: exec.h fop_template.c op.c op_mem.c
op_template.c
Log message:
Use FORCE_RET, scrap RETURN which was implemented
On 09/11/2007, J. Mayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about this patch ? Is there any remark ? Is it to be applied ?
Yes, I'm also in favour. Regarding the machines that boot off flash, I
will try to come up with some logical synatx. The Palm T|E board can
boot off the ROM and it needs no kernel
On Sat, 2007-11-10 at 00:43 +0100, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
On 09/11/2007, J. Mayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about this patch ? Is there any remark ? Is it to be applied ?
Yes, I'm also in favour. Regarding the machines that boot off flash, I
will try to come up with some logical
Windows does not seem to have this function either.
With your patch I was able to compile most of the targets from the current
CVS tree (except arm), but at least i386-softmmu is broken.
It crashes immediately with the following error:
Starting program: c:\qemu-dist9/qemu.exe -L . -hda
I must apologize for subscribing to this list, but the Qemu users list
is dead, sop this is my only option.
I understand it is a development list, but I would appreciate some help.
I will make it concise.
1) What is the best Distro to run Qemu on with the least hassles?
FYI, I now run it on
On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 08:42:52PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I must apologize for subscribing to this list, but the Qemu users list
is dead, sop this is my only option.
I understand it is a development list, but I would appreciate some help.
I will make it concise.
1) What is the
Apologizing is a sign of weakness. That's one of the rules on NCIS.
On 11/9/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I must apologize for subscribing to this list, but the Qemu users list
is dead, sop this is my only option.
I understand it is a development list, but I would
Daniel, thanks for the kind answer.
Do you know which distro would be easiest to configure kqemu in or has
kqemu accessible through yum repos ?
Thanks
Forgot to add.
I gave up on virt-install long ago due to the fact that it cannot
configure a guest on FC7.
I just used the qemu command line instructions and switches and it
worked flawlessly to install 98/ME/XP/DOS and whatsoever.
These run on 4 core Rackservers.
See below at Appendix:
What I pasted in the Appendix are the the Xen output, when I still tried
Xen, Just ignore.
Enclosed is an updated set of patches for configure, Makefile and
Makefile.target.
the configure and Makefile.target fixes are for compiling qemu on Solaris x86-64
the Makefile patch is for qemu-img when it compiles it on a system
that does not have gnutls in a standard place.
Questions?
On 11/10/07, J. Mayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2007-11-10 at 00:43 +0100, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
On 09/11/2007, J. Mayer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about this patch ? Is there any remark ? Is it to be applied ?
Yes, I'm also in favour. Regarding the machines that boot off
23 matches
Mail list logo
