On Monday 19 December 2005 18:23, Fabrice Bellard wrote:
Hi,
QEMU version 0.8.0 is out ! You can get it from:
http://bellard.org/qemu/download.html .
Fabrice.
Is x86 SSE3 supported yet?
Thanks,
Dave
--
Lose, v., experience a loss, get rid of, lose the weight
Loose, adj., not tight,
multiprocessing could also be possible at some point. Yeah - OMAP
system emulation.. :)
I have an old pci TMS320C6x development board right in front
of me as I type this. It came with windows software, but I can't
do anything with it without a new tool chain now that I am
running OpenBSD.
Dave Feustel
On Sunday 11 December 2005 11:29, Antti P Miettinen wrote:
Dave Feustel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have an old pci TMS320C6x development board right in front
of me as I type this. It came with windows software, but I can't
do anything with it without a new tool chain now that I am
On Sunday 27 November 2005 04:08, Pavel Janík wrote:
From: Dave Feustel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 15:23:36 -0500
Hi,
Is there an anonymous cvs server from which I can
checkout the current version of qemu?
I was able to find it by entering two words qemu
On Sunday 27 November 2005 05:37, Antti P Miettinen wrote:
cvs -z3 -d:ext:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/qemu co qemu
Worked like a charm! Thanks!
--
Switch to Secure OpenBSD with a KDE desktop!!!
NOW with Virtual PC OS support via QEMU and
Beowulf clustering using PETSc and MPICH2!
When I attempt to build qemu from CVS on OpenbSD 3.7
using gcc 3.3.5 (propolice), ENOTSUP is reported as an
undefined symbol. ENOTSUP is defined in vl.h, but it is
only defined for Win32. Could a #define OPENBSD
be added to qemu source for building qemu on OpenBSD
platforms?
Thanks,
Dave
invoked?
Thanks,
Dave Feustel
--
Switch to Secure OpenBSD with a KDE desktop!!!
NOW with Virtual PC OS support via QEMU and
Beowulf clustering using PETSc and MPICH2!
___
Qemu-devel mailing list
Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman
On Monday 21 November 2005 23:43, Jim C. Brown wrote:
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 08:40:37PM -0500, Dave Feustel wrote:
Are there any plans to add to qemu the capability to simulate the
Intel Vanderpool and AMD Pacifica hardware virtualization facilities?
You'd think that people would
-bit machine
running OpenBSD. ( I'm now wearing my eyeglasses again. :-) )
I have had such good results even with the downlevel 0.6.1 qemu (and I'm in the
process of upgrading to 7.1/7.2) that I am no longer looking at any other
simulators.
Dave Feustel
On Tuesday 22 November 2005 11:35, Dave
Are there any plans to add to qemu the capability to simulate the
Intel Vanderpool and AMD Pacifica hardware virtualization facilities?
Thanks,
Dave Feustel
--
Switch to Secure OpenBSD with a KDE desktop!!!
NOW with Virtual PC OS support via QEMU and
Beowulf clustering using PETSc and MPICH2
Is there any chance that simulation of the
IBM Cell processor will be added to Qemu?
Thanks,
Dave Feustel
--
Switch to Secure OpenBSD with a KDE desktop!!!
NOW with Virtual PC OS support via QEMU and
Beowulf clustering using PETSc and MPICH2
On Wednesday 16 November 2005 08:26, Lars Roland wrote:
On 11/16/05, Lars Roland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/16/05, Dave Feustel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any chance that simulation of the
IBM Cell processor will be added to Qemu?
Although this would be great, I am not sure
On Wednesday 16 November 2005 13:00, Ozan Türkyılmaz wrote:
isn't writing a OS for dual (or n) core chips hell ?
It may be Hell, but it's already done for most, if not all the BSD
and *nix operating systems now. Ditto for 64-bit x86 mode.
--
Switch to Secure OpenBSD with a KDE desktop!!!
NOW
On Monday 14 November 2005 19:02, Dave Feustel wrote:
These errors are new. I don't yet understand why they are happening.
My mistake. I saw exactly these same errors while porting PETSc and MPICH2 to
OpenBSD
and didn't realize until this morning that they were now occuring on a
*different
(apparently because of the use of ())
with the c compiler used in OpenBSD 3.7 (gcc (GCC) 3.3.5 (propolice)).
Similar statements with a symbol following the (eg (xyz)) do not generate
syntax errors. Has this been seen before? Is there a fix?
Thanks,
Dave Feustel
--
Switch to Secure OpenBSD
, but I cannot make contact with the internet.
Here is my pf ruleset, adapted from the example on page 141
of Artymiak's _Building Firewalls..._, 2nd ed.
How do I fix it to enable ip traffic between qemu and the internet?
Thanks,
Dave Feustel
---my pf ruleset-
scrub fragment reassemble
scrub
On Monday 14 November 2005 14:08, André Braga wrote:
This was fixed in the 0.7 series with the addition of keymaps support.
qemu 0.7.1 (or .2) is included in OpenBSD 3.8, but I have not got a cdrom
copy of 3.8 yet, so I am making do with 3.7 and .6.1 for the time being.
Physical booting from
welcome :-) ).
Thanks,
Dave Feustel
--
Tired of having to defend against Malware?
You know: trojans, viruses, SPYWARE, ADWARE,
KEYLOGGERS, rootkits, worms and popups.
Then Switch to OpenBSD with a KDE desktop!!!
NOW with Virtual PC OS support via QEMU
On Monday 14 November 2005 18:13, Paul Brook wrote:
On Monday 14 November 2005 23:05, Dave Feustel wrote:
I just checked the qemu source for 0.7.2 into svn
and then checked out the source. When I tried
to build the source, the build failed because the
symbolic link in i386-softmmu
ethernet interface
on Openbsd. There exist /dev/tun[0-3] but they all seem to belong
to Openbsd. What does Qemu do when the tuns are already there?
Thanks,
Dave Feustel
Maybe for the future someone is able to update the patch?
I looked through the in source of the patch
in hope for an easy
Is there any way to control Qemu with a script?
(e.g. start Qemu with
Qemu -S -hda disk.img
then feed the commands
loadvm vm state file
c
...
stop
savevm vm state file
q
to the monitor console)
Thanks,
Dave Feustel
--
Tired of having
When I try to build Qemu 7.2 on OpenBSD 3.7,
the file libutil.h is reported as not found.
The file is not in /usr/include or /usr/local/include.
Libutil.h also is not found in the qemu 7.2 source.
Is libutil.h a linux file or part of Qemu 7.2?
Thanks,
Dave Feustel
--
Tired of having to defend
this?
Thanks,
Dave Feustel
--
Tired of having to defend against Malware?
You know: trojans, viruses, SPYWARE, ADWARE,
KEYLOGGERS, rootkits, worms and popups.
Then Switch to OpenBSD with a KDE desktop!!!
___
Qemu-devel mailing list
Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cancel this. I read the documentation again and figured it out.
--
Tired of having to defend against Malware?
You know: trojans, viruses, SPYWARE, ADWARE,
KEYLOGGERS, rootkits, worms and popups.
Then Switch to OpenBSD with a KDE desktop!!!
___
On Wednesday 09 November 2005 19:18, Jim C. Brown wrote:
Actually, I think you missed one doc.
http://lilly.csoft.net/~jeffryj/cgi-bin/moin.cgi/FrequentlyAskedQuestions#head-b566901cb0207e8c085232c84e354cf97684ddc4
Jim,
This is outstanding!
Thanks!!!
Dave Feustel
--
Tired of having
/ - -
- /
@ -
etc.
Is there any easy way to fix this in the version of qemu that I am
running or should I just start using 0.7.2? (I will have to upgrade to
OpenBSD 3.8 to use the Openbsd packaged version of 0.7.2)
Thanks,
Dave Feustel
--
Tired of having to defend
Will Qemu be modified to take advantage of the hardware virtualization
facilities incorporated in AMD's Pacifica and/or Intel's Vanderpool technogies?
Thanks,
Dave Feustel
--
Tired of having to defend against Malware?
You know: trojans, viruses, SPYWARE, ADWARE,
KEYLOGGERS, rootkits, worms
On Sunday 06 November 2005 10:33, Paul Brook wrote:
On Sunday 06 November 2005 15:19, Dave Feustel wrote:
Will Qemu be modified to take advantage of the hardware virtualization
facilities incorporated in AMD's Pacifica and/or Intel's Vanderpool
technogies?
qemu is an emulator
3.7. What else do I need to do to get
qemu to successfully boot from the cdrom (and install a fresh copy of
OpenBSD 3.7 in ins37.img)?
Thanks.
Dave Feustel
--
Tired of having to defend against Malware?
You know: trojans, viruses, SPYWARE, ADWARE,
KEYLOGGERS, rootkits, worms and popups.
Then Switch
On Sunday 06 November 2005 15:24, Bakul Shah wrote:
I just directly give a .iso as cdrom as in
qemu -cdrom foo.iso -boot d ins37.img
This had not even crossed my mind; I will try it out.
I also wonder if the -boot option must preceed the file name
(as you show it here). I had them
to get the latest version and possibly
start hacking on it.
Thanks,
Dave Feustel
--
Tired of having to defend against Malware?
You know: trojans, viruses, SPYWARE, ADWARE,
KEYLOGGERS, rootkits, worms and popups.
Then Switch to OpenBSD with a KDE desktop
31 matches
Mail list logo
