On 29 Mar 2006, at 11:33, Paul Brook wrote:
Also, the gcc -O2 option is more than the sum of the other options
it enables.
That, IMHO, is a bug. Of course, its not Qemu's bug. :-)
JP
--
"The New York Times is read by the people who run the country. The
Washington Post is read by the peop
9 Mar 2006, at 01:59, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 08:26:27PM -0800, John Davidorff Pell wrote:
Out of curiosity, wouldn't it be better to specifically request that
feature of gcc, with one of its myriad options, rather than forcing a
rather large optimization sweep? I'
Out of curiosity, wouldn't it be better to specifically request that
feature of gcc, with one of its myriad options, rather than forcing a
rather large optimization sweep? I'm sure that -O2 is good generally,
but using it as a kludge to get at one of the many things that it
enables seems li
Well, it turns out I am totally confused. I checked online and -- lo
and behold -- the kqemu tar is just an elf binary :-(
I stand corrected (by myself)
JP
On 31 May 2005, at 00:00, John Davidorff Pell wrote:
Is kQemu closed source? I thought it was just not a GPL compatible
license
Is kQemu closed source? I thought it was just not a GPL compatible
license. Don't you have to build it with your qemu tree??
If you get the source code from a freely downloadable archive, then
its most certainly not closed source...
Or maybe I'm totally confused and kQemu is binary-only. :-
