On 7/31/06, Philipp Gühring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[32bit vs 64bit libraries]
Now I am wondering, whether it would be possible to integrate the processor
emulator of qemu into the Linux kernel, so that applications can
transparently use different-bitsized libraries by qemulating them on deman
On 8/7/06, R. Armiento <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Lets assume this typical website setup: HARDWARE: commodity SATA/PATA;
drive cache is not battery backed up. HOST OS: late Linux 2.6 kernel
(e.g. 2.6.15), directly, on top of host, a recent version of database
software (e.g. MySQL 5.1). Running in
On 8/6/06, NyOS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm looking for a good IDE (or just a good code editor) under linux.
My first try was kdevelop approx. 3 years ago (2.2.2 version). It was too
complicated. 3.x.x is a bit unstable.
Vi is unconfortable for me,
I prefer using pico and gnu nano, but it's to
Hi Juergen!
On 1/14/06, Juergen Pfennig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> as I found out qemu is quite stable and has acceptable performance. Using it
> you
> could freeze legacy applications using a legacy OS like win 2003 or win XP. I
> am
> talking of periods from 5 to 20 years!
Yes, that is a go
On 10/22/05, Oliver Gerlich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> is anyone here using Synergy (see synergy2.sf.net) to make the mouse go
> smoothly from host to guest? At first glance, I'd say Synergy offers
> much of the stuff that's necessary for easing the use of Qemu: it can
> transport mouse and keybo
On 10/6/05, Karl Magdsick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I wrote:> In order to pass the "D drive" to qemu, and actually give QEMU access> to the entire raw HD, the "D drive" partition would have to fill the entire> HD, and MS Windows would have to make the MBR available as part
> of the first (only, in
On 8/1/05, Blue Swirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Looks like the boot block gets loaded correctly (nice data point). It's a
> bit confusing to see UFS in the error message, shouldn't that be ISOFS or
> CDFS?
Unless the Solaris install CDs have changed since I least investigated
them: no. They con
Hi,
can I use qemu to run Solaris binaries for SPARCv8 or better even
SPARCv9 (64bit)?
Installiing Solaris under qemu would be ideal, but I found no hind how
to do it, or whether it is indeed possible.
Running Solaris binaries under a Linux/sparc kernel (which is booting
fine) should be an optio
On 5/20/05, John Hogerhuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But once you are past that point gcc for a given arch, gcc isn't
> really going to help you any more. So bring on the hand
> coding/optimizations.
And for popular combinations of architectures, such as x86 or PPC on
each other, I absolute a
On 5/19/05, Paul Brook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No. The problem is to turn machine code into (a different form of) machine
> code. A lot of the complexity in a compiler is involved with with turning the
> high-level language constructs into simple low-level machine operations.
I see your point
On 5/19/05, Paul Brook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think GNU lightning really gains us much. We'd still have to do the
> hard bits (optimization, register allocation, assigning stack slots, etc).
> The actual native code generation (which is what lightning gives you) is only
> a few hundr
On 4/29/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ben;
> Unfortunately, there aren't too many disk imaging programs I'd recommend.
> Both Norton Ghost (the old version) and DriveImage (the old version) have
> problems. And I certainly wouldn't recommend the new versions. None of the
12 matches
Mail list logo
