On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 09:16:10AM +, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
>
>
> On 06.11.2019 15:03, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 11:34:34AM +, Denis Lunev wrote:
> >> On 10/24/19 12:28 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 02:55:47PM +0300, Denis
On 05.12.2019 10:59, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
> Ping!
>
> On 25.11.2019 12:16, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 06.11.2019 15:03, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 11:34:34AM +, Denis Lunev wrote:
On 10/24/19 12:28 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18,
Ping!
On 25.11.2019 12:16, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
>
>
> On 06.11.2019 15:03, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 11:34:34AM +, Denis Lunev wrote:
>>> On 10/24/19 12:28 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 02:55:47PM +0300, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
>
On 06.11.2019 15:03, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 11:34:34AM +, Denis Lunev wrote:
>> On 10/24/19 12:28 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 02:55:47PM +0300, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
From: "Denis V. Lunev"
Linux guests submit IO
On 13.11.2019 16:18, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 12:38:48PM +, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
>>
>> On 06.11.2019 15:03, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 11:34:34AM +, Denis Lunev wrote:
On 10/24/19 12:28 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 12:38:48PM +, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
>
>
> On 06.11.2019 15:03, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 11:34:34AM +, Denis Lunev wrote:
> >> On 10/24/19 12:28 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 02:55:47PM +0300, Denis
On 06.11.2019 15:03, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 11:34:34AM +, Denis Lunev wrote:
>> On 10/24/19 12:28 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 02:55:47PM +0300, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
From: "Denis V. Lunev"
Linux guests submit IO
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 05:28:17PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 02:55:47PM +0300, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
> > From: "Denis V. Lunev"
> >
> > Linux guests submit IO requests no longer than PAGE_SIZE * max_seg
> > field reported by SCSI controler. Thus typical
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 11:34:34AM +, Denis Lunev wrote:
> On 10/24/19 12:28 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 02:55:47PM +0300, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
> >> From: "Denis V. Lunev"
> >>
> >> Linux guests submit IO requests no longer than PAGE_SIZE * max_seg
> >> field
On 10/24/19 12:28 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 02:55:47PM +0300, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
>> From: "Denis V. Lunev"
>>
>> Linux guests submit IO requests no longer than PAGE_SIZE * max_seg
>> field reported by SCSI controler. Thus typical sequential read with
>> 1 MB size
On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 02:24:55PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 02:55:47PM +0300, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
> > From: "Denis V. Lunev"
> >
> > Linux guests submit IO requests no longer than PAGE_SIZE * max_seg
> > field reported by SCSI controler. Thus typical sequential
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 02:55:47PM +0300, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
> From: "Denis V. Lunev"
>
> Linux guests submit IO requests no longer than PAGE_SIZE * max_seg
> field reported by SCSI controler. Thus typical sequential read with
> 1 MB size results in the following pattern of the IO from the
On 10/23/19 5:17 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 04:01:57AM +, Denis Lunev wrote:
>> On 10/21/19 4:24 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 02:55:47PM +0300, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
From: "Denis V. Lunev"
Linux guests submit IO requests no
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 04:01:57AM +, Denis Lunev wrote:
> On 10/21/19 4:24 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 02:55:47PM +0300, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
> >> From: "Denis V. Lunev"
> >>
> >> Linux guests submit IO requests no longer than PAGE_SIZE * max_seg
> >> field
On 21.10.2019 16:24, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 02:55:47PM +0300, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
>> From: "Denis V. Lunev"
>>
>> Linux guests submit IO requests no longer than PAGE_SIZE * max_seg
>> field reported by SCSI controler. Thus typical sequential read with
>> 1 MB size
On 10/21/19 4:24 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 02:55:47PM +0300, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
>> From: "Denis V. Lunev"
>>
>> Linux guests submit IO requests no longer than PAGE_SIZE * max_seg
>> field reported by SCSI controler. Thus typical sequential read with
>> 1 MB size
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 02:55:47PM +0300, Denis Plotnikov wrote:
> From: "Denis V. Lunev"
>
> Linux guests submit IO requests no longer than PAGE_SIZE * max_seg
> field reported by SCSI controler. Thus typical sequential read with
> 1 MB size results in the following pattern of the IO from the
From: "Denis V. Lunev"
Linux guests submit IO requests no longer than PAGE_SIZE * max_seg
field reported by SCSI controler. Thus typical sequential read with
1 MB size results in the following pattern of the IO from the guest:
8,16 115754 2.766095122 2071 D R 2095104 + 1008 [dd]
18 matches
Mail list logo