On Sun, Apr 25, 2021 at 02:21:38PM +0200, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
> On 11.10.2020 01:30, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
> > On 09.10.2020 23:33, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 11:05:47PM +0200, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
> > > > On 09.10.2020 22:07, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > >
On 11.10.2020 01:30, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
On 09.10.2020 23:33, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 11:05:47PM +0200, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
On 09.10.2020 22:07, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
Having properties registered conditionally makes QOM type
introspection difficult. Inste
On 09.10.2020 23:33, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 11:05:47PM +0200, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
>> On 09.10.2020 22:07, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>>> Having properties registered conditionally makes QOM type
>>> introspection difficult. Instead of skipping registration of the
>>> "
On 09.10.2020 22:07, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> Having properties registered conditionally makes QOM type
> introspection difficult. Instead of skipping registration of the
> "instanceid" property, always register the property but validate
> its value against the instance id required by the class.
>
On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 11:05:47PM +0200, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
> On 09.10.2020 22:07, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > Having properties registered conditionally makes QOM type
> > introspection difficult. Instead of skipping registration of the
> > "instanceid" property, always register the prope
Having properties registered conditionally makes QOM type
introspection difficult. Instead of skipping registration of the
"instanceid" property, always register the property but validate
its value against the instance id required by the class.
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost
---
Note: due to the