On Fri, 27 Mar 2020 13:06:28 +0100
Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I just quickly hacked hw-reduced acpi (using arm/virt as model)
>
> Can you send the patch or push a branch nevertheless?
It's no suitable for patch but I pushed it to my github repo
https://github.com/imammedo/qemu.git
Hi,
> I just quickly hacked hw-reduced acpi (using arm/virt as model)
Can you send the patch or push a branch nevertheless?
thanks,
Gerd
On Thu, 26 Mar 2020 03:33:35 -0400
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 07:44:34PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 16:03:39 +0100
> > Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 01:32:12PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 19 Mar
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 07:44:34PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 16:03:39 +0100
> Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 01:32:12PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > > On Thu, 19 Mar 2020 09:01:04 +0100
> > > Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > >
> > > > I know that not
On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 10:16:36 +0100
Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > > mounted. Decided to use the "i8042: PNP: No PS/2 controller found."
> > > line instead for a simple test (just check the kernel log timestamps,
> > > three runs each). The ACPI initialization is already done at that
> > > point, so
On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 16:03:39 +0100
Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 01:32:12PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Thu, 19 Mar 2020 09:01:04 +0100
> > Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> >
> > > I know that not supporting ACPI in microvm is intentional. If you still
> > > don't want ACPI
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 01:32:12PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Mar 2020 09:01:04 +0100
> Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>
> > I know that not supporting ACPI in microvm is intentional. If you still
> > don't want ACPI this is perfectly fine, you can use the usual -no-acpi
> > switch to
On Thu, 19 Mar 2020 09:01:04 +0100
Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> I know that not supporting ACPI in microvm is intentional. If you still
> don't want ACPI this is perfectly fine, you can use the usual -no-acpi
> switch to toggle ACPI support.
>
> These are the advantages you are going to loose then:
On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 10:16:36 +0100
Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > > mounted. Decided to use the "i8042: PNP: No PS/2 controller found."
> > > line instead for a simple test (just check the kernel log timestamps,
> > > three runs each). The ACPI initialization is already done at that
> > > point, so
> > mounted. Decided to use the "i8042: PNP: No PS/2 controller found."
> > line instead for a simple test (just check the kernel log timestamps,
> > three runs each). The ACPI initialization is already done at that
> > point, so it should be useful nevertheless. Here we go:
> >
> > Without
On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 13:09:48 +0100
Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 06:51:10AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 09:01:04AM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > > I know that not supporting ACPI in microvm is intentional. If you still
> > > don't want ACPI
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 06:51:10AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 09:01:04AM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > I know that not supporting ACPI in microvm is intentional. If you still
> > don't want ACPI this is perfectly fine, you can use the usual -no-acpi
> > switch to
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 09:01:04AM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> I know that not supporting ACPI in microvm is intentional. If you still
> don't want ACPI this is perfectly fine, you can use the usual -no-acpi
> switch to toggle ACPI support.
>
> These are the advantages you are going to loose
On 20/03/20 09:32, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Hmm, seems we should have that for better regression testing.
> master branch doesn't build with pc+q35+isapc turned off:
>
> LINKx86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64
> hw/virtio/virtio-iommu.o: In function `virtio_iommu_get_bdf':
>
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 06:34:40PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 19/03/20 14:40, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> >> Also, can you confirm that it builds without CONFIG_I440FX and
> >> CONFIG_Q35? You probably need to add "imply ACPI" and possibly some
> >> '#include "config-devices.h"' and '#ifdef
On 19/03/20 14:40, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>> Also, can you confirm that it builds without CONFIG_I440FX and
>> CONFIG_Q35? You probably need to add "imply ACPI" and possibly some
>> '#include "config-devices.h"' and '#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI' here and there.
> Hmm, is there some way to do this without
Hi,
> Also, can you confirm that it builds without CONFIG_I440FX and
> CONFIG_Q35? You probably need to add "imply ACPI" and possibly some
> '#include "config-devices.h"' and '#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI' here and there.
Hmm, is there some way to do this without modifying
Hi,
> The main reason for not having ACPI was the time that it took to start;
Yep, ACPI needs additional boot time. Shouldn't be a big difference
though, microvm acpi only declares some devices and has small tables.
Also no acpi methods, so no interpreter work. Maybe it is mostly the
On 19/03/20 10:33, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 09:49:55AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 19/03/20 09:01, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>>> I know that not supporting ACPI in microvm is intentional. If you still
>>> don't want ACPI this is perfectly fine, you can use the usual
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 09:49:55AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 19/03/20 09:01, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > I know that not supporting ACPI in microvm is intentional. If you still
> > don't want ACPI this is perfectly fine, you can use the usual -no-acpi
> > switch to toggle ACPI support.
>
>
On 19/03/20 09:01, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> I know that not supporting ACPI in microvm is intentional. If you still
> don't want ACPI this is perfectly fine, you can use the usual -no-acpi
> switch to toggle ACPI support.
Could we change -no-acpi into a "-machine acpi=..." property? Then it
can
Patchew URL: https://patchew.org/QEMU/20200319080117.7725-1-kra...@redhat.com/
Hi,
This series failed the docker-mingw@fedora build test. Please find the testing
commands and
their output below. If you have Docker installed, you can probably reproduce it
locally.
=== TEST SCRIPT BEGIN ===
#!
Patchew URL: https://patchew.org/QEMU/20200319080117.7725-1-kra...@redhat.com/
Hi,
This series failed the docker-quick@centos7 build test. Please find the testing
commands and
their output below. If you have Docker installed, you can probably reproduce it
locally.
=== TEST SCRIPT BEGIN ===
Patchew URL: https://patchew.org/QEMU/20200319080117.7725-1-kra...@redhat.com/
Hi,
This series failed the asan build test. Please find the testing commands and
their output below. If you have Docker installed, you can probably reproduce it
locally.
=== TEST SCRIPT BEGIN ===
#!/bin/bash
export
I know that not supporting ACPI in microvm is intentional. If you still
don't want ACPI this is perfectly fine, you can use the usual -no-acpi
switch to toggle ACPI support.
These are the advantages you are going to loose then:
(1) virtio-mmio device discovery without command line hacks
25 matches
Mail list logo
