On 29/11/2019 08.38, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>
>
> On 28.11.19 16:05, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 at 12:48, Christian Borntraeger
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 28.11.19 13:45, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 13:35:29 +0100
Christian Borntraeger wrote:
On 28.11.19 16:05, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 at 12:48, Christian Borntraeger
> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 28.11.19 13:45, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>>> On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 13:35:29 +0100
>>> Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>>
Ack.
Conny, I think this would be really nice
On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 at 12:48, Christian Borntraeger
wrote:
>
>
>
> On 28.11.19 13:45, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 13:35:29 +0100
> > Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> >
> >> Ack.
> >>
> >> Conny, I think this would be really nice to have for 4.2 (together with a
> >> bios rebuild)
On 28.11.19 14:16, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 14:11:38 +0100
> Thomas Huth wrote:
>
>> On 28/11/2019 13.35, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>> Ack.
>>>
>>> Conny, I think this would be really nice to have for 4.2 (together with a
>>> bios rebuild)
>>> as this fixes a
On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 01:33 PM +0100, Claudio Imbrenda
wrote:
> The existing s390 bios gets the LOADPARM information from the system using
> an SCLP call that specifies a buffer length too small to contain all the
> output.
>
> The recent fixes in the SCLP code have exposed this bug, since now
On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 13:33:57 +0100
Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
> The existing s390 bios gets the LOADPARM information from the system using
> an SCLP call that specifies a buffer length too small to contain all the
> output.
>
> The recent fixes in the SCLP code have exposed this bug, since now the
On 28/11/2019 13.35, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
Ack.
Conny, I think this would be really nice to have for 4.2 (together with a bios
rebuild)
as this fixes a regression. Opinions?
If we do another rc of 4.2, I think we definitely want this to be
included, otherwise quite a bunch of things
On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 14:11:38 +0100
Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 28/11/2019 13.35, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> > Ack.
> >
> > Conny, I think this would be really nice to have for 4.2 (together with a
> > bios rebuild)
> > as this fixes a regression. Opinions?
>
> If we do another rc of 4.2, I
On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 13:35:29 +0100
Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Ack.
>
> Conny, I think this would be really nice to have for 4.2 (together with a
> bios rebuild)
> as this fixes a regression. Opinions?
I fear that this is a bit late for 4.2... but this should get a
cc:stable.
>
>
>
>
On 28.11.19 13:45, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 13:35:29 +0100
> Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>
>> Ack.
>>
>> Conny, I think this would be really nice to have for 4.2 (together with a
>> bios rebuild)
>> as this fixes a regression. Opinions?
>
> I fear that this is a bit late
On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 13:33:57 +0100
Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
[...]
> Signed-off-by: Claudio Imbrenda
I forgot this:
Reported-by: Marc Hartmayer
[...]
please add the reported-by when merging :)
On 11/28/19 1:33 PM, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
> The existing s390 bios gets the LOADPARM information from the system using
> an SCLP call that specifies a buffer length too small to contain all the
> output.
>
> The recent fixes in the SCLP code have exposed this bug, since now the
> SCLP call
Ack.
Conny, I think this would be really nice to have for 4.2 (together with a bios
rebuild)
as this fixes a regression. Opinions?
On 28.11.19 13:33, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
> The existing s390 bios gets the LOADPARM information from the system using
> an SCLP call that specifies a buffer
The existing s390 bios gets the LOADPARM information from the system using
an SCLP call that specifies a buffer length too small to contain all the
output.
The recent fixes in the SCLP code have exposed this bug, since now the
SCLP call will return an error (as per architecture) instead of
14 matches
Mail list logo
