On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 03:43:43AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 11:10:58AM -0400, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > Rename the enums to match the naming style used by QAPI, and to
> > use "32" and "64" instead of "20" and "31". This will allow us
> > to more easily move the
On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 11:10:58AM -0400, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> Rename the enums to match the naming style used by QAPI, and to
> use "32" and "64" instead of "20" and "31". This will allow us
> to more easily move the enum to the QAPI schema later.
>
> About the naming choice: "SMBIOS 2.1 ent
Rename the enums to match the naming style used by QAPI, and to
use "32" and "64" instead of "20" and "31". This will allow us
to more easily move the enum to the QAPI schema later.
About the naming choice: "SMBIOS 2.1 entry point"/"SMBIO 3.0
entry point" and "32-bit entry point"/"64-bit entry po
On 10/26/21 17:10, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> Rename the enums to match the naming style used by QAPI, and to
> use "32" and "64" instead of "20" and "31". This will allow us
> to more easily move the enum to the QAPI schema later.
>
> About the naming choice: "SMBIOS 2.1 entry point"/"SMBIO 3.0
>
