On 09.01.23 15:39, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 05.01.23 18:18, Peter Xu wrote:
On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 12:02:12PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
+bool migration_incoming_postcopy_listening(void)
+{
+PostcopyState ps = postcopy_state_get();
+
+return ps >= POSTCOPY_INCOMING_LISTENING &&
On 05.01.23 18:18, Peter Xu wrote:
On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 12:02:12PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
+bool migration_incoming_postcopy_listening(void)
+{
+PostcopyState ps = postcopy_state_get();
+
+return ps >= POSTCOPY_INCOMING_LISTENING && ps < POSTCOPY_INCOMING_END;
+}
This name i
On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 12:02:12PM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> +bool migration_incoming_postcopy_listening(void)
> +{
> +PostcopyState ps = postcopy_state_get();
> +
> +return ps >= POSTCOPY_INCOMING_LISTENING && ps < POSTCOPY_INCOMING_END;
> +}
This name is misleading, IMHO.
The co
Let's factor out both checks, to be used in virtio-mem context next.
While at it, fix a spelling error in a related comment.
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand
---
include/migration/misc.h | 6 +-
migration/migration.c| 14 ++
migration/ram.c | 16 ++--
3
