On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 02:28:44PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> This forth version is based on review comments and suggestion
> from David in v3.
>
> changes from v3:
> - patch 4:
> * copied the explanation in spapr_numa_define_associativity_domains()
> to the commit message
>
On 10/8/20 6:13 AM, Greg Kurz wrote:
On Wed, 7 Oct 2020 14:28:44 -0300
Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
This forth version is based on review comments and suggestion
Series for SLOF ? ;-) ;-) ;-)
hahahaha sad thing is that a typo in "fourth" is the only viable
way for me to send a Forth
On Wed, 7 Oct 2020 14:28:44 -0300
Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> This forth version is based on review comments and suggestion
Series for SLOF ? ;-) ;-) ;-)
> from David in v3.
>
> changes from v3:
> - patch 4:
> * copied the explanation in spapr_numa_define_associativity_domains()
>
This forth version is based on review comments and suggestion
from David in v3.
changes from v3:
- patch 4:
* copied the explanation in spapr_numa_define_associativity_domains()
to the commit message
* return numa_level directly instead of calculating a temp
value in spapr_numa