On 10/2/20 5:19 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
John Snow writes:
On 10/1/20 4:52 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
John Snow writes:
On 9/30/20 4:47 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
John Snow writes:
I did not say "sphinx beautiful", just "sphinx compatible". They will
not throw errors when parse
John Snow writes:
> On 10/1/20 4:52 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> John Snow writes:
>>
>>> On 9/30/20 4:47 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
John Snow writes:
> I did not say "sphinx beautiful", just "sphinx compatible". They will
> not throw errors when parsed and interpreted a
On 10/1/20 4:52 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
John Snow writes:
On 9/30/20 4:47 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
John Snow writes:
I did not say "sphinx beautiful", just "sphinx compatible". They will
not throw errors when parsed and interpreted as ReST.
"Bang on the keyboard until Sphinx does
On 10/1/20 4:54 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
John Snow writes:
On 9/30/20 4:47 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Sadly, the fact that start_if() and end_if() are functions isn't
immediately obvious anymore.
I've seen :func:`start_if` elsewhere. Is this something we should
or
want to use?
Looks
John Snow writes:
> On 9/30/20 4:47 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> John Snow writes:
>>
>>> I did not say "sphinx beautiful", just "sphinx compatible". They will
>>> not throw errors when parsed and interpreted as ReST.
>> "Bang on the keyboard until Sphinx doesn't throw errors anymore"
>> mig
John Snow writes:
> On 9/30/20 4:47 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Sadly, the fact that start_if() and end_if() are functions isn't
>> immediately obvious anymore.
>> I've seen :func:`start_if` elsewhere. Is this something we should
>> or
>> want to use?
>
> Looks like `start_if()` works just f
On 9/30/20 4:47 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Sadly, the fact that start_if() and end_if() are functions isn't
immediately obvious anymore.
I've seen :func:`start_if` elsewhere. Is this something we should or
want to use?
Looks like `start_if()` works just fine too. If you are hard-set in
wan
On 9/30/20 4:47 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
John Snow writes:
I did not say "sphinx beautiful", just "sphinx compatible". They will
not throw errors when parsed and interpreted as ReST.
"Bang on the keyboard until Sphinx doesn't throw errors anymore" might
be good enough for a certain kind
John Snow writes:
> I did not say "sphinx beautiful", just "sphinx compatible". They will
> not throw errors when parsed and interpreted as ReST.
"Bang on the keyboard until Sphinx doesn't throw errors anymore" might
be good enough for a certain kind of mathematician, but a constructive
solution
I did not say "sphinx beautiful", just "sphinx compatible". They will
not throw errors when parsed and interpreted as ReST.
Signed-off-by: John Snow
---
scripts/qapi/gen.py| 6 --
scripts/qapi/parser.py | 9 +
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/scripts
10 matches
Mail list logo
