Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] s390: Extended-Length SCCB & DIAGNOSE 0x318

2020-09-25 Thread Cornelia Huck
On Fri, 25 Sep 2020 17:32:05 +0200 Claudio Imbrenda wrote: > On Fri, 25 Sep 2020 17:18:55 +0200 > Cornelia Huck wrote: > > > On Fri, 25 Sep 2020 11:13:49 -0400 > > Collin Walling wrote: > > > > > On 9/16/20 1:15 PM, Collin Walling wrote: > > > > On 9/16/20 11:53 AM, Cornelia Huck

Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] s390: Extended-Length SCCB & DIAGNOSE 0x318

2020-09-25 Thread Claudio Imbrenda
On Fri, 25 Sep 2020 17:18:55 +0200 Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Fri, 25 Sep 2020 11:13:49 -0400 > Collin Walling wrote: > > > On 9/16/20 1:15 PM, Collin Walling wrote: > > > On 9/16/20 11:53 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > > > > > [...] > > > > > >>> > > >> > > >> Thanks, applied. > > >>

Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] s390: Extended-Length SCCB & DIAGNOSE 0x318

2020-09-25 Thread Cornelia Huck
On Fri, 25 Sep 2020 11:13:49 -0400 Collin Walling wrote: > On 9/16/20 1:15 PM, Collin Walling wrote: > > On 9/16/20 11:53 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > > > [...] > > > >>> > >> > >> Thanks, applied. > >> > >> > > > > Thanks Conny. > > > > Much appreciated for everyone's patience and

Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] s390: Extended-Length SCCB & DIAGNOSE 0x318

2020-09-25 Thread Collin Walling
On 9/16/20 1:15 PM, Collin Walling wrote: > On 9/16/20 11:53 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > [...] > >>> >> >> Thanks, applied. >> >> > > Thanks Conny. > > Much appreciated for everyone's patience and review. The only thing I'd > like to hold out on for now is for someone to take a peek at patch

Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] s390: Extended-Length SCCB & DIAGNOSE 0x318

2020-09-16 Thread Collin Walling
On 9/16/20 11:53 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote: [...] >> > > Thanks, applied. > > Thanks Conny. Much appreciated for everyone's patience and review. The only thing I'd like to hold out on for now is for someone to take a peek at patch #3 with respect to the protected virtualization stuff. I don't

Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] s390: Extended-Length SCCB & DIAGNOSE 0x318

2020-09-16 Thread Cornelia Huck
On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 15:44:08 -0400 Collin Walling wrote: > Changelog: > > v6 > > • sccb_verify_boundary function: > • s/len/sccb_len > • removed the endian check/conversion of the sccb_len from within > this function (caller is now responsible) > > •

Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] s390: Extended-Length SCCB & DIAGNOSE 0x318

2020-09-16 Thread Cornelia Huck
On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 12:57:37 -0700 (PDT) no-re...@patchew.org wrote: > Patchew URL: > https://patchew.org/QEMU/20200915194416.107460-1-wall...@linux.ibm.com/ > > > > Hi, > > This series failed build test on FreeBSD host. Please find the details below. > > === TEST SCRIPT BEGIN === >

Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] s390: Extended-Length SCCB & DIAGNOSE 0x318

2020-09-15 Thread no-reply
Patchew URL: https://patchew.org/QEMU/20200915194416.107460-1-wall...@linux.ibm.com/ Hi, This series failed build test on FreeBSD host. Please find the details below. === TEST SCRIPT BEGIN === #!/bin/bash # Testing script will be invoked under the git checkout with # HEAD pointing to a

[PATCH v6 0/8] s390: Extended-Length SCCB & DIAGNOSE 0x318

2020-09-15 Thread Collin Walling
Changelog: v6 • sccb_verify_boundary function: • s/len/sccb_len • removed the endian check/conversion of the sccb_len from within this function (caller is now responsible) • proper endian conversion when using header length to malloc • use g_autofree