On 11/9/23 12:11, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 8/9/23 21:21, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On Fri, Sep 8, 2023 at 7:28 PM Kevin Wolf wrote:
Maybe the calls aren't eliminated because --enable-debug implies -O0?
My experience is that it will still fold simple dead code like "0 &&
foo()" or even
On Mon, 2023-09-11 at 07:06 -0400, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Sept 2023 at 06:10, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
> wrote:
> >
> > On 8/9/23 17:47, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > > I wonder how it passed CI?
> > > https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/pipelines/996175923/
> >
> > The conditions
Am 11.09.2023 um 12:22 hat Philippe Mathieu-Daudé geschrieben:
> On 11/9/23 12:10, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> > On 8/9/23 17:47, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > > I wonder how it passed CI?
> > > https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/pipelines/996175923/
> >
> > The conditions are:
> > - x86
On Mon, 11 Sept 2023 at 06:10, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>
> On 8/9/23 17:47, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > I wonder how it passed CI?
> > https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/pipelines/996175923/
>
> The conditions are:
> - x86 host
> - both system / user emulation enabled
> - KVM disabled
>
11.09.2023 13:41, Michael Tokarev:
What can be done though is, instead of making kvm_arch_get_supported_cpuid
et all a stubs, to replace them in .h file with an empty macro when some
condition(s) are met. In other words, fold kvm_enabled() "inside" of
kvm_arch_get_supported_cpuid() and use
08.09.2023 22:21, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On Fri, Sep 8, 2023 at 7:28 PM Kevin Wolf wrote:
Maybe the calls aren't eliminated because --enable-debug implies -O0?
My experience is that it will still fold simple dead code like "0 &&
foo()" or even "if (0) { ... }", but maybe it's a GCC vs. clang
On 11/9/23 12:10, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 8/9/23 17:47, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
I wonder how it passed CI?
https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/pipelines/996175923/
The conditions are:
- x86 host
- both system / user emulation enabled
- KVM disabled
- debug enabled
Oh, I forgot:
On 8/9/23 21:21, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On Fri, Sep 8, 2023 at 7:28 PM Kevin Wolf wrote:
Maybe the calls aren't eliminated because --enable-debug implies -O0?
My experience is that it will still fold simple dead code like "0 &&
foo()" or even "if (0) { ... }", but maybe it's a GCC vs. clang
On 8/9/23 17:47, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
I wonder how it passed CI?
https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/pipelines/996175923/
The conditions are:
- x86 host
- both system / user emulation enabled
- KVM disabled
- debug enabled
We have jobs with 3 of the 4, but none with
all the 4.
Is it
On Fri, Sep 8, 2023 at 7:28 PM Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Maybe the calls aren't eliminated because --enable-debug implies -O0?
My experience is that it will still fold simple dead code like "0 &&
foo()" or even "if (0) { ... }", but maybe it's a GCC vs. clang
difference. Philippe, I take it that you
Am 08.09.2023 um 19:16 hat Kevin Wolf geschrieben:
> Am 08.09.2023 um 18:11 hat Philippe Mathieu-Daudé geschrieben:
> > Hi Kevin,
> >
> > On 8/9/23 17:01, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > > Am 07.09.2023 um 17:44 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> > > > Applied, thanks.
> > > >
> > > > Please update the
08.09.2023 20:16, Kevin Wolf:
Am 08.09.2023 um 18:11 hat Philippe Mathieu-Daudé geschrieben:
Hi Kevin,
On 8/9/23 17:01, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 07.09.2023 um 17:44 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
Applied, thanks.
Please update the changelog at https://wiki.qemu.org/ChangeLog/8.2 for any
On Fri, Sep 08, 2023 at 07:16:16PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 08.09.2023 um 18:11 hat Philippe Mathieu-Daudé geschrieben:
> > Hi Kevin,
> >
> > On 8/9/23 17:01, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > > Am 07.09.2023 um 17:44 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> > > > Applied, thanks.
> > > >
> > > > Please
Am 08.09.2023 um 18:11 hat Philippe Mathieu-Daudé geschrieben:
> Hi Kevin,
>
> On 8/9/23 17:01, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Am 07.09.2023 um 17:44 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> > > Applied, thanks.
> > >
> > > Please update the changelog at https://wiki.qemu.org/ChangeLog/8.2 for
> > > any
Hi Kevin,
On 8/9/23 17:01, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 07.09.2023 um 17:44 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
Applied, thanks.
Please update the changelog at https://wiki.qemu.org/ChangeLog/8.2 for any
user-visible changes.
Something in this has broken the build for me, it seems to be the
I wonder how it passed CI?
https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/pipelines/996175923/
Stefan
On Fri, 8 Sept 2023 at 11:02, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>
> Am 07.09.2023 um 17:44 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> > Applied, thanks.
> >
> > Please update the changelog at
Am 07.09.2023 um 17:44 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> Applied, thanks.
>
> Please update the changelog at https://wiki.qemu.org/ChangeLog/8.2 for any
> user-visible changes.
Something in this has broken the build for me, it seems to be the
linux-user binary that doesn't link any more:
Applied, thanks.
Please update the changelog at https://wiki.qemu.org/ChangeLog/8.2 for any
user-visible changes.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
The following changes since commit 17780edd81d27fcfdb7a802efc870a99788bd2fc:
Merge tag 'quick-fix-pull-request' of https://gitlab.com/bsdimp/qemu into
staging (2023-08-31 10:06:29 -0400)
are available in the Git repository at:
https://gitlab.com/bonzini/qemu.git tags/for-upstream
for you
19 matches
Mail list logo
