On Friday 16 March 2007 22:06, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
This patch contains some ugly but very useful chnages:
- in cpu-exec.c, halt the arm CPU on CPU_INTERRUPT_HALT like in other
architectures.
This is ok. Though I'd prefer it to actually be common code (like
CPU_INTERRUPT_DEBUG).
-
On 17/03/07, Paul Brook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 16 March 2007 22:06, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
This patch contains some ugly but very useful chnages:
- in cpu-exec.c, halt the arm CPU on CPU_INTERRUPT_HALT like in other
architectures.
This is ok. Though I'd prefer it to actually
On 17/03/07, andrzej zaborowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 17/03/07, Paul Brook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 16 March 2007 22:06, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
This patch contains some ugly but very useful chnages:
- in cpu-exec.c, halt the arm CPU on CPU_INTERRUPT_HALT like in other
This patch contains some ugly but very useful chnages:
- in cpu-exec.c, halt the arm CPU on CPU_INTERRUPT_HALT like in other
architectures.
- wake the cpu up on CPU_INTERRUPT_EXITTB - this serves waking the
CPU up without asserting IRQ or FIQ, which is possible on PXA. Would
it be better to add a
