Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] RISC-V: Select FPU gdb xml file based on the supported extensions

2019-07-05 Thread Georg Kotheimer
> While this appears reasonable, I wonder if RVF w/o RVD actually works? > > Examining the two get/set functions, they always transfer 64 bits for the fpu > registers. Wouldn't that implicate that FPU debugging has never been working properly on RV32, as prior to my changes the FPU registers on RV

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] RISC-V: Select FPU gdb xml file based on the supported extensions

2019-07-03 Thread no-reply
Patchew URL: https://patchew.org/QEMU/20190703142617.21073-1-georg.kothei...@kernkonzept.com/ Hi, This series failed the asan build test. Please find the testing commands and their output below. If you have Docker installed, you can probably reproduce it locally. === TEST SCRIPT BEGIN === #!/

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] RISC-V: Select FPU gdb xml file based on the supported extensions

2019-07-03 Thread Richard Henderson
On 7/3/19 4:26 PM, Georg Kotheimer wrote: > The size of the FPU registers depends solely on the floating point > extensions supported by the target architecture. > However, in the previous implementation the floating point register > size was derived from whether the target architecture is 32-bit o

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH] RISC-V: Select FPU gdb xml file based on the supported extensions

2019-07-03 Thread Georg Kotheimer
The size of the FPU registers depends solely on the floating point extensions supported by the target architecture. However, in the previous implementation the floating point register size was derived from whether the target architecture is 32-bit or 64-bit. Signed-off-by: Georg Kotheimer --- co