On 15/12/2015 12:28, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Now in target-arm.next. I also did s/__FUNCTION__/__func__/
> since checkpatch complains about it and we're touching these lines
> of code anyway.
Thanks!
Paolo
On 4 December 2015 at 16:52, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 4 December 2015 at 16:39, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>>> I don't think we've ever said "we should transition away from HWADDR_*",
>>> but whether we should is an interesting question, which is why I asked.
>>> Does retaining the format macros to
On 4 December 2015 at 16:39, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>> I don't think we've ever said "we should transition away from HWADDR_*",
>> but whether we should is an interesting question, which is why I asked.
>> Does retaining the format macros to go with the typedef give us
>> useful flexibility, or is
> I don't think we've ever said "we should transition away from HWADDR_*",
> but whether we should is an interesting question, which is why I asked.
> Does retaining the format macros to go with the typedef give us
> useful flexibility, or is it just confusing?
I think it's confusing, but not eno
On 4 December 2015 at 12:36, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 04/12/2015 13:33, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 4 December 2015 at 12:28, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> This is a first baby step towards removing widespread inclusion of
>>> cpu.h and compiling more devices once (so that arm, aarch64 and
>>> in
Paolo Bonzini writes:
> This is a first baby step towards removing widespread inclusion of
> cpu.h and compiling more devices once (so that arm, aarch64 and
> in the future target-multi can share the object files).
Sounds like something that should be covered in
http://qemu-project.org/CodeTrans
On 04/12/2015 13:33, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 4 December 2015 at 12:28, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> This is a first baby step towards removing widespread inclusion of
>> cpu.h and compiling more devices once (so that arm, aarch64 and
>> in the future target-multi can share the object files).
>>
>>
On 4 December 2015 at 12:28, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> This is a first baby step towards removing widespread inclusion of
> cpu.h and compiling more devices once (so that arm, aarch64 and
> in the future target-multi can share the object files).
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
> ---
> hw/dma/soc_d
This is a first baby step towards removing widespread inclusion of
cpu.h and compiling more devices once (so that arm, aarch64 and
in the future target-multi can share the object files).
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
---
hw/dma/soc_dma.c | 37 -
1 file changed,
