Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] better handling of removal in IOHandlerRecord list

2007-01-11 Thread Fabrice Bellard
I think a more complete patch is needed to fully correct the problem. Regards, Fabrice. jerome Arbez-Gindre wrote: On Thu, 2007-01-11 at 14:56 +0100, jerome Arbez-Gindre wrote: On Wed, 2007-01-10 at 17:34 +0100, jerome Arbez-Gindre wrote: Hi, by a call to qemu_set_fd_handler(fd,NULL,NULL,

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] better handling of removal in IOHandlerRecord list

2007-01-11 Thread jerome Arbez-Gindre
On Thu, 2007-01-11 at 14:56 +0100, jerome Arbez-Gindre wrote: > On Wed, 2007-01-10 at 17:34 +0100, jerome Arbez-Gindre wrote: > > Hi, > > > > by a call to qemu_set_fd_handler(fd,NULL,NULL,NULL) in the fd_read > > callback, I have generated a "Segmentation fault" in vl.c. > > > > My solution is no

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] better handling of removal in IOHandlerRecord list

2007-01-11 Thread jerome Arbez-Gindre
On Wed, 2007-01-10 at 17:34 +0100, jerome Arbez-Gindre wrote: > Hi, > > by a call to qemu_set_fd_handler(fd,NULL,NULL,NULL) in the fd_read > callback, I have generated a "Segmentation fault" in vl.c. > > My solution is not very smart... but it is very simple. I reply to myself because I did not

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH] better handling of removal in IOHandlerRecord list

2007-01-10 Thread jerome Arbez-Gindre
Hi, by a call to qemu_set_fd_handler(fd,NULL,NULL,NULL) in the fd_read callback, I have generated a "Segmentation fault" in vl.c. My solution is not very smart... but it is very simple. Index: vl.c === RCS file: /sources/qemu/qemu