On 23 July 2012 15:21, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 29 June 2012 15:04, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> On 06/28/2012 12:51 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> On 20 June 2012 15:44, Anthony Liguori wrote:
This avoids the problem associated with having multiple target specific
files in a single direct
On 29 June 2012 15:04, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 06/28/2012 12:51 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 20 June 2012 15:44, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>> This avoids the problem associated with having multiple target specific
>>> files in a single directory with the current build system.
>>>
>>> We can e
Il 29/06/2012 14:31, Andreas Färber ha scritto:
>> > Ping? I can't figure out if this discussion got wedged (in which
>> > case, how should it be unwedged?) or if people were eventually happy
>> > with this patch...
> My guess is we're waiting for Paolo to return from vacation and to
> comment. Bas
On 1 July 2012 14:37, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 23/06/2012 12:30, Peter Maydell ha scritto:
>>> > Can't it go in hw/arm/kvm (mimicking the final desired place, which
>>> > will be target-arm/hw/kvm)? And hw/kvm can be moved to hw/i386/kvm, or
>>> > we can leave it there for now until we're ready t
Il 23/06/2012 12:30, Peter Maydell ha scritto:
>> > Can't it go in hw/arm/kvm (mimicking the final desired place, which
>> > will be target-arm/hw/kvm)? And hw/kvm can be moved to hw/i386/kvm, or
>> > we can leave it there for now until we're ready to move it to
>> > target-i386/hw/kvm.
> Why's the
On 06/28/2012 12:51 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 20 June 2012 15:44, Anthony Liguori wrote:
This avoids the problem associated with having multiple target specific files
in a single directory with the current build system.
We can eventually get rid of the hw/$BASE_ARCH/Makefiles.obj files too
Am 28.06.2012 19:51, schrieb Peter Maydell:
> On 20 June 2012 15:44, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> This avoids the problem associated with having multiple target specific files
>> in a single directory with the current build system.
>>
>> We can eventually get rid of the hw/$BASE_ARCH/Makefiles.obj fi
On 20 June 2012 15:44, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> This avoids the problem associated with having multiple target specific files
> in a single directory with the current build system.
>
> We can eventually get rid of the hw/$BASE_ARCH/Makefiles.obj files too
Ping? I can't figure out if this discussi
On 23 June 2012 08:53, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Peter's got an ARM specific KVM device he wants to stick in hw/kvm.
>
> Can't it go in hw/arm/kvm (mimicking the final desired place, which
> will be target-arm/hw/kvm)? And hw/kvm can be moved to hw/i386/kvm, or
> we can leave it there for now until
> What is exactly the problem?
>
> Peter's got an ARM specific KVM device he wants to stick in hw/kvm.
Can't it go in hw/arm/kvm (mimicking the final desired place, which
will be target-arm/hw/kvm)? And hw/kvm can be moved to hw/i386/kvm, or
we can leave it there for now until we're ready to m
On 06/21/2012 07:31 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
(Sorry for breaking the thread).
This avoids the problem associated with having multiple target specific files
in a single directory with the current build system.
What is exactly the problem?
Peter's got an ARM specific KVM device he wants to st
(Sorry for breaking the thread).
> This avoids the problem associated with having multiple target specific files
> in a single directory with the current build system.
What is exactly the problem?
I saw something about dependencies, I think that should be solved with
something like
$(foreach va
On 06/20/2012 09:51 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 20.06.2012 16:44, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
diff --git a/hw/kvm/Makefile.objs b/hw/kvm/Makefile.objs
index 226497a..cf734ba 100644
--- a/hw/kvm/Makefile.objs
+++ b/hw/kvm/Makefile.objs
@@ -1 +1 @@
-obj-$(CONFIG_KVM) += clock.o apic.o i8259.o ioapic
Am 20.06.2012 17:07, schrieb Peter Maydell:
> On 20 June 2012 16:04, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Am 20.06.2012 17:01, schrieb Peter Maydell:
>>> I'm confused -- as far as I can tell these files are compiled per
>>> target, eg we have both
>>> CCi386-softmmu/hw/kvm/clock.o
>>> and
>>> CCx8
On 20 June 2012 15:44, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> This avoids the problem associated with having multiple target specific files
> in a single directory with the current build system.
>
> We can eventually get rid of the hw/$BASE_ARCH/Makefiles.obj files too
>
> Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori
> ---
On 20 June 2012 16:04, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 20.06.2012 17:01, schrieb Peter Maydell:
>> I'm confused -- as far as I can tell these files are compiled per
>> target, eg we have both
>> CC i386-softmmu/hw/kvm/clock.o
>> and
>> CC x86_64-softmmu/hw/kvm/clock.o
>
> Currently yes, but w
Am 20.06.2012 17:01, schrieb Peter Maydell:
> On 20 June 2012 15:51, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Am 20.06.2012 16:44, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
>>> --- a/hw/kvm/Makefile.objs
>>> +++ b/hw/kvm/Makefile.objs
>>> @@ -1 +1 @@
>>> -obj-$(CONFIG_KVM) += clock.o apic.o i8259.o ioapic.o i8254.o
>>> +obj-$(CON
On 20 June 2012 15:51, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 20.06.2012 16:44, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
>> --- a/hw/kvm/Makefile.objs
>> +++ b/hw/kvm/Makefile.objs
>> @@ -1 +1 @@
>> -obj-$(CONFIG_KVM) += clock.o apic.o i8259.o ioapic.o i8254.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_I386) += clock.o apic.o i8259.o ioapic.o i8254.o
This avoids the problem associated with having multiple target specific files
in a single directory with the current build system.
We can eventually get rid of the hw/$BASE_ARCH/Makefiles.obj files too
Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori
---
I tried to add a nice comment to the config-target.mak that
Am 20.06.2012 16:44, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> This avoids the problem associated with having multiple target specific files
> in a single directory with the current build system.
>
> We can eventually get rid of the hw/$BASE_ARCH/Makefiles.obj files too
>
> Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori
> ---
20 matches
Mail list logo
