On 7 June 2015 at 20:19, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 3:51 AM, Peter Maydell
> wrote:
>> worked when I looked at it :-) We'd get duplicate lines in
>> the config files, but we already have those when host==target.
>>
>
> Brute force it and sort -u? sort is considered a core
On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 3:51 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 7 June 2015 at 09:49, Peter Crosthwaite
> wrote:
>> OK I am at the bottom of it. The case statement only handles the base
>> arch and the host arch not the actual target arch.
>
> Aha.
>
>> This means the
>> "arm)" case is all that is cal
On 7 June 2015 at 09:49, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
> OK I am at the bottom of it. The case statement only handles the base
> arch and the host arch not the actual target arch.
Aha.
> This means the
> "arm)" case is all that is called for aarch64 target. the "aarch64)"
> case in existing code is p
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 1:24 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 26 May 2015 at 09:01, Peter Crosthwaite
> wrote:
>> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 12:18 AM, Peter Maydell
>> wrote:
>>> On 26 May 2015 at 06:49, Peter Crosthwaite
>>> wrote:
From: Peter Crosthwaite
The "arm" variant for this
On 26 May 2015 at 09:01, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 12:18 AM, Peter Maydell
> wrote:
>> On 26 May 2015 at 06:49, Peter Crosthwaite
>> wrote:
>>> From: Peter Crosthwaite
>>>
>>> The "arm" variant for this case already contains everything needed
>>> for aarch64. As aarch6
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 12:18 AM, Peter Maydell
wrote:
> On 26 May 2015 at 06:49, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
>> From: Peter Crosthwaite
>>
>> The "arm" variant for this case already contains everything needed
>> for aarch64. As aarch64 already uses arm as a base architecture, it
>> will already ha
On 26 May 2015 at 06:49, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
> From: Peter Crosthwaite
>
> The "arm" variant for this case already contains everything needed
> for aarch64. As aarch64 already uses arm as a base architecture, it
> will already have the CONFIG_ARM_DIS defined meaning no functional
> change. S
From: Peter Crosthwaite
The "arm" variant for this case already contains everything needed
for aarch64. As aarch64 already uses arm as a base architecture, it
will already have the CONFIG_ARM_DIS defined meaning no functional
change. So just make the configure code simpler.
Following this patch:
