Stefan Weil wrote:
> A code review run by Steve Grubb complained about code in e1000.c:
>
> In hw/e1000.c at line 89, vlan is declared to be 4 bytes.
> At line 382 is an attempt to do a memmove over it with a size of 12.
> +/* Fields vlan and data must not be reordered or separated. */
>
A code review run by Steve Grubb complained about code in e1000.c:
In hw/e1000.c at line 89, vlan is declared to be 4 bytes.
At line 382 is an attempt to do a memmove over it with a size of 12.
This was fixed by splitting the memmove in two calls and
adding a comment to the declaration of vlan an