On 06/02/2010 12:33 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
From: Michael Tokarev
In net/tap-linux.c, when manipulation of /dev/net/tun fails, it prints
(with fprintf) something like this:
warning: could not open /dev/net/tun: no virtual network emulation
this has 2 issues:
1) it is not a warning real
Luiz Capitulino writes:
> On Wed, 02 Jun 2010 20:26:58 +0200
> Markus Armbruster wrote:
>
>> Luiz Capitulino writes:
>>
>> > From: Michael Tokarev
>> >
>> > In net/tap-linux.c, when manipulation of /dev/net/tun fails, it prints
>> > (with fprintf) something like this:
>> >
>> > warning: cou
On Wed, 02 Jun 2010 20:26:58 +0200
Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Luiz Capitulino writes:
>
> > From: Michael Tokarev
> >
> > In net/tap-linux.c, when manipulation of /dev/net/tun fails, it prints
> > (with fprintf) something like this:
> >
> > warning: could not open /dev/net/tun: no virtual ne
Luiz Capitulino writes:
> From: Michael Tokarev
>
> In net/tap-linux.c, when manipulation of /dev/net/tun fails, it prints
> (with fprintf) something like this:
>
> warning: could not open /dev/net/tun: no virtual network emulation
>
> this has 2 issues:
> 1) it is not a warning really, it's
From: Michael Tokarev
In net/tap-linux.c, when manipulation of /dev/net/tun fails, it prints
(with fprintf) something like this:
warning: could not open /dev/net/tun: no virtual network emulation
this has 2 issues:
1) it is not a warning really, it's a fatal error (kvm exits after
that),
2)
On 04/23/2010 08:28 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 23.04.2010 14:52, schrieb Michael Tokarev:
Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 22.04.2010 11:52, schrieb Markus Armbruster:
Michael Tokarev writes:
In net/tap-linux.c, when manipulation of /dev/net/tun fails, it prints
(with fprintf)
Michael Tokarev writes:
> Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Michael Tokarev writes:
>>
>>> In net/tap-linux.c, when manipulation of /dev/net/tun fails, it prints
>>> (with fprintf) something like this:
>>>
>>> warning: could not open /dev/net/tun: no virtual network emulation
>>>
>>> this has 2 iss
Am 23.04.2010 14:52, schrieb Michael Tokarev:
> Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> Am 22.04.2010 11:52, schrieb Markus Armbruster:
>>> Michael Tokarev writes:
>>>
In net/tap-linux.c, when manipulation of /dev/net/tun fails, it prints
(with fprintf) something like this:
> []
TFR(fd = ope
Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 22.04.2010 11:52, schrieb Markus Armbruster:
>> Michael Tokarev writes:
>>
>>> In net/tap-linux.c, when manipulation of /dev/net/tun fails, it prints
>>> (with fprintf) something like this:
>>>
[]
>>> TFR(fd = open("/dev/net/tun", O_RDWR));
>>> if (fd < 0) {
>>> -
Am 22.04.2010 11:52, schrieb Markus Armbruster:
> Michael Tokarev writes:
>
>> In net/tap-linux.c, when manipulation of /dev/net/tun fails, it prints
>> (with fprintf) something like this:
>>
>> warning: could not open /dev/net/tun: no virtual network emulation
>>
>> this has 2 issues:
>> 1) i
Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Michael Tokarev writes:
>
>> In net/tap-linux.c, when manipulation of /dev/net/tun fails, it prints
>> (with fprintf) something like this:
>>
>> warning: could not open /dev/net/tun: no virtual network emulation
>>
>> this has 2 issues:
>> 1) it is not a warning real
Michael Tokarev writes:
> In net/tap-linux.c, when manipulation of /dev/net/tun fails, it prints
> (with fprintf) something like this:
>
> warning: could not open /dev/net/tun: no virtual network emulation
>
> this has 2 issues:
> 1) it is not a warning really, it's a fatal error (kvm exits af
In net/tap-linux.c, when manipulation of /dev/net/tun fails, it prints
(with fprintf) something like this:
warning: could not open /dev/net/tun: no virtual network emulation
this has 2 issues:
1) it is not a warning really, it's a fatal error (kvm exits after that),
2) there's no indication a
13 matches
Mail list logo
