On 12 June 2015 at 18:56, Peter Crosthwaite
wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 5:19 AM, Eric Auger wrote:
>> commit ac9d32e39664e060cd1b538ff190980d57ad69e4 had the consequence to
>> register the do_cpu_reset after the rom_reset one. Hence they get
>> executed in the wrong order. This commit restor
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 5:19 AM, Eric Auger wrote:
> commit ac9d32e39664e060cd1b538ff190980d57ad69e4 had the consequence to
> register the do_cpu_reset after the rom_reset one. Hence they get
> executed in the wrong order. This commit restores the registration of
> do_cpu_reset in arm_load_kernel.
Hi Peter,
Please can you test whether this patch fixes the issue on xlnx-ep108
board. I acknowledge I do not feel comfortable with that piece of code
and meanwhile I continue looking at boot.c & loader.c files.
Thank you in advance
Best Regards
Eric
On 06/12/2015 02:19 PM, Eric Auger wrote:
>
commit ac9d32e39664e060cd1b538ff190980d57ad69e4 had the consequence to
register the do_cpu_reset after the rom_reset one. Hence they get
executed in the wrong order. This commit restores the registration of
do_cpu_reset in arm_load_kernel.
Signed-off-by: Eric Auger
---
hw/arm/boot.c | 20 +++
