On 03/27/2016 03:33 AM, Nutan Shinde wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So, this patch won't be considered, because there is already a patch
> related to the same issue, right?
>
You'd have to follow the other thread to see if the patch was accepted
or not. Even if it isn't, etiquette is generally that it'd be
Hi,
So, this patch won't be considered, because there is already a patch
related to the same issue, right?
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 7:40 PM, John Snow wrote:
>
>
> On 03/23/2016 01:30 AM, Nutan Shinde wrote:
> > Hi John,
> >
> > My patch is same as the patch mentioned in the link. I just picked
On 03/23/2016 01:30 AM, Nutan Shinde wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> My patch is same as the patch mentioned in the link. I just picked up
> the task from BitSizedTask page, as it was not crossed.
>
> I guess the issue is resolved then, what should I do in this case? Also,
> please tell me, how do I know
Hi John,
My patch is same as the patch mentioned in the link. I just picked up the
task from BitSizedTask page, as it was not crossed.
I guess the issue is resolved then, what should I do in this case? Also,
please tell me, how do I know which tasks are already taken up?
Regards,
Nutan Shinde.
On 03/22/2016 12:34 AM, Nutan Shinde wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Nutan Shinde
> ---
> hw/display/blizzard.c | 8
> hw/display/blizzard_template.h | 26 +-
> hw/display/omap_lcd_template.h | 8 +---
> hw/display/omap_lcdc.c | 6 --
> hw/disp
On 03/22/2016 02:34 AM, Nutan Shinde wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Nutan Shinde
> ---
> hw/display/blizzard.c | 8
> hw/display/blizzard_template.h | 26 +-
> hw/display/omap_lcd_template.h | 8 +---
> hw/display/omap_lcdc.c | 6 --
> hw/di
