Some architectures (like Blackfin) only implement ppoll (and skip poll).
So add support for it using existing poll code.
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org
---
linux-user/syscall.c | 29 -
1 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git
On 23 January 2011 19:56, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
Some architectures (like Blackfin) only implement ppoll (and skip poll).
So add support for it using existing poll code.
This looks wrong -- ppoll() is supposed to be atomic, but
your implementation isn't. Why can't we just
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 16:25, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 23 January 2011 19:56, Mike Frysinger wrote:
Some architectures (like Blackfin) only implement ppoll (and skip poll).
So add support for it using existing poll code.
This looks wrong -- ppoll() is supposed to be atomic, but
your
On 23 January 2011 21:35, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 16:25, Peter Maydell wrote:
This looks wrong -- ppoll() is supposed to be atomic, but
your implementation isn't. Why can't we just implement this
by calling the host ppoll? (might need a configure test,
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 17:35, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 23 January 2011 21:35, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 16:25, Peter Maydell wrote:
This looks wrong -- ppoll() is supposed to be atomic, but
your implementation isn't. Why can't we just implement this
by calling the host
