On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 10:51:43AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 03:32:03PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
[...]
> > > Are there cases where we need the original requester id value?
> > > I am guessing not, and if I'm right we should just change the
> > > implementation
> > >
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 03:32:03PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 10:11:31AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 02:53:18PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 02:40:30PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> > > > Recently I encountered issue when deb
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 10:11:31AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 02:53:18PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> > On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 02:40:30PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> > > Recently I encountered issue when debugging Intel IOMMU IR codes,
> > > that interrupts are not working
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 02:53:18PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 02:40:30PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> > Recently I encountered issue when debugging Intel IOMMU IR codes,
> > that interrupts are not working correctly with PCI bridges (reported
> > by Radim). This patch fixes the pr
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 02:40:30PM +0800, Peter Xu wrote:
> Recently I encountered issue when debugging Intel IOMMU IR codes,
> that interrupts are not working correctly with PCI bridges (reported
> by Radim). This patch fixes the problem. I assume requester ID
> should be the devfn on root PCI bus
Recently I encountered issue when debugging Intel IOMMU IR codes,
that interrupts are not working correctly with PCI bridges (reported
by Radim). This patch fixes the problem. I assume requester ID
should be the devfn on root PCI bus (that's how I understand it
before, and also in guest kernel, IRT
