Il 16/09/2013 18:51, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
>> >
>> > We can have "make check" run QEMU once for each board, which would trap
>> > things that will always break at runtime such as a misspelled property.
>> > Similarly, we could have tests that try to instantiate every device,
>> > even if
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 06:07:33PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 16/09/2013 18:01, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
> > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 05:56:56PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >> Il 16/09/2013 17:48, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
> >>> http://sweng.the-davies.net/Home/rustys-api-design-m
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 05:24:46PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 16.09.2013 14:33, schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
> > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 08:32:13AM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> >> Am 15.09.2013 19:23, schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
> >>> Add a helper macro for adding read-only properties, that
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 05:56:56PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 16/09/2013 17:48, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
> > http://sweng.the-davies.net/Home/rustys-api-design-manifesto
> >
> > Even then: it will be at best
> > "5. Do it right or it will always break at runtime."
> >
> > We need to s
Il 16/09/2013 18:01, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 05:56:56PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 16/09/2013 17:48, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
>>> http://sweng.the-davies.net/Home/rustys-api-design-manifesto
>>>
>>> Even then: it will be at best
>>> "5. Do it right or i
Il 16/09/2013 17:24, Andreas Färber ha scritto:
>> >
>> > Shouldn't we have a constant for the "realized" string?
> That's a two-sided sword: We actually shouldn't be setting realized =
> true manually but once on machine init - in that case we wouldn't
> strictly need a constant.
>
> I pushed to
Il 16/09/2013 17:48, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
> http://sweng.the-davies.net/Home/rustys-api-design-manifesto
>
> Even then: it will be at best
> "5. Do it right or it will always break at runtime."
>
> We need to switch to APIs at
> "9. The compiler/linker won't let you get it wrong."
We d
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 08:32:13AM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 15.09.2013 19:23, schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
> > Add a helper macro for adding read-only properties, that works in the
> > common case where the value is a constant.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin
> > ---
> >
> > I'
Am 16.09.2013 14:33, schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 08:32:13AM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Am 15.09.2013 19:23, schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
>>> Add a helper macro for adding read-only properties, that works in the
>>> common case where the value is a constant.
>>>
>>> Sig
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 08:32:13AM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 15.09.2013 19:23, schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
> > Add a helper macro for adding read-only properties, that works in the
> > common case where the value is a constant.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin
> > ---
> >
> > I'
Am 15.09.2013 19:23, schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
> Add a helper macro for adding read-only properties, that works in the
> common case where the value is a constant.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin
> ---
>
> I'm using this patch in my acpi work - any objections
> to applying it on my tree?
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 06:54:35PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 15 September 2013 18:23, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > +/* Add a property that is an integer constant. */
> > +#define OBJECT_ADD_PROP_CONST(obj, name, value) \
> > +do {
On 15 September 2013 18:23, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> +/* Add a property that is an integer constant. */
> +#define OBJECT_ADD_PROP_CONST(obj, name, value) \
> +do {\
> +void OBJECT_ADD_PROP_GET(
Add a helper macro for adding read-only properties, that works in the
common case where the value is a constant.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin
---
I'm using this patch in my acpi work - any objections
to applying it on my tree?
include/qom/object.h | 21 +
1 file change
14 matches
Mail list logo
