Peter Maydell writes:
> On 17 July 2013 10:30, Christoffer Dall wrote:
>> I'm not familiar enough with QEMU internals to intelligently comment on
>> this discussion, but I do have two observations:
>>
>> (1) It would be tremendously beneficial to have this patch series
>> merged, so people can a
On 17 July 2013 10:30, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> I'm not familiar enough with QEMU internals to intelligently comment on
> this discussion, but I do have two observations:
>
> (1) It would be tremendously beneficial to have this patch series
> merged, so people can actually start to have upstream
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 12:56:31PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 08.07.2013, at 23:06, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>
> > Alexander Graf writes:
> >
> >> On 08.07.2013, at 22:08, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >>
> >>> I think we're trying to fit a square peg into a round hole.
> >>>
> >>> virtio-m
On 08.07.2013, at 23:06, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Alexander Graf writes:
>
>> On 08.07.2013, at 22:08, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>
>>> I think we're trying to fit a square peg into a round hole.
>>>
>>> virtio-mmio is a virtio transport where each device has a dedicated set
>>> of system resour
Am 08.07.2013 23:06, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> Alexander Graf writes:
>
>> On 08.07.2013, at 22:08, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>
>>> I think we're trying to fit a square peg into a round hole.
>>>
>>> virtio-mmio is a virtio transport where each device has a dedicated set
>>> of system resources.
>
Alexander Graf writes:
> On 08.07.2013, at 22:08, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>
>> I think we're trying to fit a square peg into a round hole.
>>
>> virtio-mmio is a virtio transport where each device has a dedicated set
>> of system resources.
>>
>> Alex, it sounds like you want virtio-mmio-bus whi
On 08.07.2013, at 22:08, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Peter Maydell writes:
>
>> On 8 July 2013 14:45, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>> On 08.07.2013, at 15:23, Peter Maydell wrote:
Now I'm completely confused. Why would assigned devices
have anything to do with this? Can you explain in more
>>
Peter Maydell writes:
> On 8 July 2013 14:45, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> On 08.07.2013, at 15:23, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> Now I'm completely confused. Why would assigned devices
>>> have anything to do with this? Can you explain in more
>>> detail, because I don't really see what you're suggestin
On 8 July 2013 14:45, Alexander Graf wrote:
> On 08.07.2013, at 15:23, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> Now I'm completely confused. Why would assigned devices
>> have anything to do with this? Can you explain in more
>> detail, because I don't really see what you're suggesting?
>
> The only missing link w
On 08.07.2013, at 15:23, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 8 July 2013 14:16, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>> On 08.07.2013, at 15:08, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>
>>> On 8 July 2013 13:59, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 08.07.2013, at 14:57, Alexander Graf wrote:
> On 27.06.2013, at 15:04, Peter Maydell w
On 8 July 2013 14:16, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 08.07.2013, at 15:08, Peter Maydell wrote:
>
>> On 8 July 2013 13:59, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>> On 08.07.2013, at 14:57, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 27.06.2013, at 15:04, Peter Maydell wrote:
> The basic idea is that the board instantiates
On 8 July 2013 13:59, Alexander Graf wrote:
> On 08.07.2013, at 14:57, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> On 27.06.2013, at 15:04, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> The basic idea is that the board instantiates some transports,
>>
>> I really dislike that idea. Couldn't you also create a new
>> bus for your vexpress
On 08.07.2013, at 15:08, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 8 July 2013 13:59, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> On 08.07.2013, at 14:57, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>> On 27.06.2013, at 15:04, Peter Maydell wrote:
The basic idea is that the board instantiates some transports,
>>>
>>> I really dislike that idea.
On 08.07.2013, at 14:57, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 27.06.2013, at 15:04, Peter Maydell wrote:
>
>> This patch series adds an implementation of the virtio-mmio
>> transport, and uses it in the vexpress-a9 and vexpress-a15
>> board models.
>>
>> The basic idea is that the board instantiates s
On 27.06.2013, at 15:04, Peter Maydell wrote:
> This patch series adds an implementation of the virtio-mmio
> transport, and uses it in the vexpress-a9 and vexpress-a15
> board models.
>
> The basic idea is that the board instantiates some transports,
I really dislike that idea. Couldn't you al
This patch series adds an implementation of the virtio-mmio
transport, and uses it in the vexpress-a9 and vexpress-a15
board models.
The basic idea is that the board instantiates some transports,
the user can create backends which automatically plug into them
(via -device virtio-blk-backend and th
16 matches
Mail list logo
