Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/10] Support the Capstone disassembler

2017-09-19 Thread Richard Henderson
On 09/19/2017 12:30 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > On 09/19/2017 01:13 PM, Richard Henderson wrote: >> [ Just saw this, so missed adding tags to the v2 patch set. ] >> >> On 09/14/2017 11:53 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: >>> At least this msg disappeared: >>> >>> "Disassembler disagrees

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/10] Support the Capstone disassembler

2017-09-19 Thread Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
On 09/19/2017 01:13 PM, Richard Henderson wrote: [ Just saw this, so missed adding tags to the v2 patch set. ] On 09/14/2017 11:53 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: At least this msg disappeared: "Disassembler disagrees with translator over instruction decoding" It's back in v2. For i386,

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/10] Support the Capstone disassembler

2017-09-19 Thread Richard Henderson
[ Just saw this, so missed adding tags to the v2 patch set. ] On 09/14/2017 11:53 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > At least this msg disappeared: > > "Disassembler disagrees with translator over instruction decoding" It's back in v2. > For i386, arm, mips32/64: > Tested-by: Philippe

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/10] Support the Capstone disassembler

2017-09-14 Thread Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
On 09/14/2017 03:35 PM, Richard Henderson wrote: As occasionally discussed on this list, due to licensing conflicts, we are restricted to a version of libopcodes that pre-dates its upstream re-licensing to gplv3. That makes our copy rather old and dated. I've already seen this as problematic

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/10] Support the Capstone disassembler

2017-09-14 Thread Richard Henderson
As occasionally discussed on this list, due to licensing conflicts, we are restricted to a version of libopcodes that pre-dates its upstream re-licensing to gplv3. That makes our copy rather old and dated. I've already seen this as problematic for s390x guest. I'm sure the same problem exists