Amit Shah wrote:
> On (Fri) Mar 26 2010 [01:09:23], Jamie Lokier wrote:
> > Amit Shah wrote:
> > > The number of ports on the source as well as the destination machines
> > > should match. If they don't, it means some ports that got hotplugged on
> > > the source aren't instantiated on the destinat
On (Fri) Mar 26 2010 [01:09:23], Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Amit Shah wrote:
> > The number of ports on the source as well as the destination machines
> > should match. If they don't, it means some ports that got hotplugged on
> > the source aren't instantiated on the destination. Or that ports that
> >
Amit Shah wrote:
> The number of ports on the source as well as the destination machines
> should match. If they don't, it means some ports that got hotplugged on
> the source aren't instantiated on the destination. Or that ports that
> were hot-unplugged on the source are created on the destinatio
The number of ports on the source as well as the destination machines
should match. If they don't, it means some ports that got hotplugged on
the source aren't instantiated on the destination. Or that ports that
were hot-unplugged on the source are created on the destination.
Signed-off-by: Amit S