On 09/18/2012 01:49 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> I don't have a good answer here, but how do we guarantee that we're
> not overrunning the tcg inst buffer?
Dunno. Not a new problem though, since the old code does the same thing.
r~
On 09/09/2012 11:05 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
---
target-s390x/insn-data.def | 14
target-s390x/translate.c | 191 -
2 files changed, 116 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target-s390x/insn-dat
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
---
target-s390x/insn-data.def | 14
target-s390x/translate.c | 191 -
2 files changed, 116 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target-s390x/insn-data.def b/target-s390x/insn-data.def
index 103c1d2..b1f0
